• Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    If only there was some sort of device that would allow you to input those commands without interfering with others, or vice versa… But it’s probably just a dream…

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Isn’t it cheaper and quieter to just type out your prompts?

    This is akin to people who have conversations on speakerphone in public places.

    • axus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      AI needs to measure the level of confidence in your voice, to calibrate its bullshit accordingly

    • VinegarChunks@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Older people such as myself tend to hate voice-to-text I think because it was so awful in the past. And if you screwed up with it in the past it was a less understandable excuse that “I was using voice-to-text.” And because we were all forced in some way to learn to type well.

      Voice to text works a little bit better now. And I think younger people know everyone else uses it and to forgive when it screws up.

      • Beehaw_Girl@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Voice to text is better for you now than it was in the past? I remember in 2014 voice to text worked great for me. Now it hardly ever works.

      • edible_funk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It worked better five years ago before they replaced the existing algorithms with AI bullshit. Keeps adding slurs to my dictionary too since they replaced keyboard prediction with modern AI and so many people use slurs Google just assumes I do too.

      • nightlily@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        I hate it because it’s generally intensely US-centric. Not understanding non-US accents or terms.

      • chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’m going to need significant levels of convincing. Computers have always preferred specificity and accuracy, it’s half the reason I’m in my current position (MSP Escalations/level 3, half of my success at fixing issues is being extremely specific in looking up exact error messages instead of paraphrasing).

        This isn’t a defense of AI; on the contrary, it’s my doubt that AI can read intentions/inflection/emotion better than just writing out what you actually want.

        • qaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Deepseek recently published a paper in which they describe that vision tokens contain more information than text tokens and that this can be used to compress context.

          We present DeepSeek-OCR as an initial investigation into the feasibility of compressing long contexts via optical 2D mapping.

          Experiments show that when the number of text tokens is within 10 times that of vision tokens (i.e., a compression ratio < 10×), the model can achieve decoding (OCR) precision of 97%. Even at a compression ratio of 20×, the OCR accuracy still remains at about 60%. This shows considerable promise for research areas such as historical long-context compression and memory forgetting mechanisms in LLMs.

          It reminds me of LLM caveman speak, it used to have another option to use Chinese instead of English. A language like Chinese is seemingly better at encoding information in fewer tokens and I think this is the same mechanism why OCR tokens work so well.

          That said, I also doubt that voice messages are more efficient than text prompts, but it’s best not to waste too much time engaging with these sorts of LinkedIn posts (and LinkedIn in general).

        • db_null@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          LLMs don’t need accuracy. This just boils down to speaking being faster than typing, especially if your thought isn’t fully formulated.

      • VibeSurgeon@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        As far as I know, these workflows typically involve a transcription model to convert the audio to text, and then passing the text to the model.

  • graphito@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Cap here. The product is called vocal dampener and used by singers during warmup

    text

    • Patrikvo@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Every husband here is sad for all those years he didn’t knew these existed. Mothers and teachers wonder if these are available in kid-sizes. Kids wonder what glue works on both this device and the teachers skin.

  • Michal@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why not give them private offices? If AI is increasing productivity and replacing workers they should have enough space left.

  • homes@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    in this one picture, I see generations of so many individual great ideas coalescing into one fantastically bad idea (and stupidly comical consequence) that is so… bizarre that I can both simultaneously understand why nobody really saw it coming, and am in low-key disbelief that this is even real…

    • SparroHawc@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      4 days ago

      I mean, that’s a steno mask, and anyone who’s had issues with hand pain but wants to communicate via text has probably wished for something resembling this. The problem is that they’re obnoxiously expensive. (And they look ridiculous, but that’s its own issue.)

      When I’m in public, I wish people had these. I neither need nor want to listen to your phone conversations.

      • Axolotl@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Their price is so dumb, that thing shouldn’t cost that much

        Just like those accessibility tools that let you use control the mouse pointer using only your mouth etc etc, they have stupid prices when some aren’t even that complex

        • SparroHawc@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          They’re a niche product that has a very solid use case (court transcripts). They require far less training than a stenotype, but because they’re so niche, the people who do make them can more-or-less charge what they want. If we’re being less skeptical, the low demand means the manufacturers can’t take advantage of the efficiencies of scale, so the price remains high.

    • lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      of course it’s not, because every laptop and airpod has noise cancelling input isolation

      But as far as rage bait goes, top tier

  • dasrael@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s lazy enough to vibe code, but when you’re too lazy to even type a prompt…sheeeesh

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    I love the implication that he’s speaking to the AI and wants to not disturb people, but has no headphones on. so I can only assume it’s responding from the speakers.

    note

    Yes, I know it could be responding over text instead of voice.

    • Coriza@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Which I think it is even more funny, why not just type them if is not a full audio back and forth.

      • Michal@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Because it’s faster to speak than type, but reading is more practical than listening, especially if taking information is your main focus.

        It’s scannable, easier to read and reread selectively important parts, and listening to code is not useful.