Don’t feel special, it would kill anyone and everyone

3. he was gathering evidence of an employee or delivery partner comitting fraud

Pretty farken standard. IT isn’t considered important unless they want their personal laptop de-porned

Technically vaccines are related to diagnosis in that one must be alive to be diagnosed

Half the fckn roads pothole on heavy rains, we don’t need someone’s dick extension tearing them up further

There’s a fucker that keeps driving a yank tank RAM at my local bunnings. I can barely see over the hood and at 170cm i am not a small woman

Make him into a baguette

Seamonkey

nah, I’m good.

weird hill but ok.

Like, If I support animal rights I’d just say “I support animal rights” I won’t say “I’m with hitler on animal rights”

Hitler didn’t originate animal kindness though

Femicide is a specific type of murder that only applies under certain circumstances; but one of those circumstances requires the victim to be female. That is a gender based discriminating factor.

This is a common practise in law. Murder in and of itself does not have a specific single charge in most systems, it’s categorised by intent and circumstance, ranging from manslaughter to crimes against humanity. Femicide is a subset of hate crime that has resulted in death due to misogynistic or sexist opinions, actions against women

A murder charge that factors in the context of the murderer’s opinion of gay men as a factor in the crime is not discriminating against heterosexuals. It’s merely a recognition that certain motivators and context involved in the crime (eg homophobia) have become so significant within society that they warrant their own classification. And as a classified crime, it now has the options for its own sentencing. That is what is occurring here.

it is explicitly and intentionally discriminating on the basis of gender

How.

We are discussing murder victims here. They are not receiving preferential treatment. They are dead.

In order for a murder to be femicide, it specifically needs to be perpetrated by a man and the victim needs to be a woman.

inexact and unnecessarily emotive. You’ve hinged your argument on a fallacy. Femicide requires very specific circumstances to be surrounding the crime of murder

Are you planning on killing women for misogynistic reasons? Are you planning on taking domestic abuse to its all too comment conclusion? Are you, in short, planning on committing murderous hate crimes? No? Then this consequence does not apply.

Please explain the sexism.

So do half the agitators in this thread

Yea… I’m with the incels

If you ever find yourself uttering this sentence you really wanna rethink your stance

If that’s your takeaway you need help

Like most countries it varies based on circumstance

But that’s not the point. It’s a specific crime they are targeting here (your first hint is the name!)

Your “logic” is no such thing. And stop pretending your scenarios exist isolate of context. Damned fool.