UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoAntiwoke Straight of Hormwinlemmy.worldimagemessage-square106linkfedilinkarrow-up1528arrow-down16cross-posted to: noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works
arrow-up1522arrow-down1imageAntiwoke Straight of Hormwinlemmy.worldUnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square106linkfedilinkcross-posted to: noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works
minus-squareKirp123@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up41·2 months agoWell it would be Dubai and the Saudis that would be irradiated. They should be fine with it right?
minus-squareAriselas@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up33·2 months agothe gas would likely be irradiated too. I heard of an early proposal to detonate nukes deep underground in the tar sands to bring the oil to the top, theoretically it would work but radioactive oil.
minus-squareRcklsabndn@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up29·2 months agoNot irradiated! It’s been treated with Shell Atomic Boost! Just look for the glowing pump.
minus-squareInternetCitizen2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up18·2 months agoThis is the talent McDonald’s marketing needs.
minus-squareerrer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoYou mean my cars get free nuke juice? Why aren’t we doing this again?
minus-squareautriyo@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 months agoThe Americans actually tried that with some gas reserves, and as expected nuclear fracking increased yields, but radioactive gas. So they’re the only country who has nukes themselves for economic reasons…
minus-square[object Object]@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months ago the only country who has nuked themselves for economic reasons Unless you count sealing gas field blowouts, which was apparently done five times and one time for methane blowout, and lots of other test explosions like geological exploration.
minus-squareautriyo@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoAre those economic reasons? Or disaster management?
minus-square[object Object]@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months ago 39 explosions for geological exploration (trying to find new natural gas deposits by studying seismic waves produced by small nuclear explosions) 25 explosions to intensify oil and gas debits 22 explosions to create underground storage for natural gas Does this sound like disaster management?
minus-squareautriyo@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoSorry I should’ve read the second link too, my bad…
minus-squareSkullgrid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 months agofuck them saudis and their sportswashing
minus-squareaxh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 months agoThat would guarantee a bright future for Dubai
Well it would be Dubai and the Saudis that would be irradiated. They should be fine with it right?
the gas would likely be irradiated too. I heard of an early proposal to detonate nukes deep underground in the tar sands to bring the oil to the top, theoretically it would work but radioactive oil.
Not irradiated! It’s been treated with Shell Atomic Boost!
Just look for the glowing pump.
This is the talent McDonald’s marketing needs.
You mean my cars get free nuke juice? Why aren’t we doing this again?
The Americans actually tried that with some gas reserves, and as expected nuclear fracking increased yields, but radioactive gas.
So they’re the only country who has nukes themselves for economic reasons…
Unless you count sealing gas field blowouts, which was apparently done five times and one time for methane blowout, and lots of other test explosions like geological exploration.
Are those economic reasons? Or disaster management?
Does this sound like disaster management?
Sorry I should’ve read the second link too, my bad…
fuck them saudis and their sportswashing
That would guarantee a bright future for Dubai