• Pyr@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Almost similar GDP as well

      Canada GDP (2026): $2.51 Trillion USD

      California GDP (2025): $4.25 Trillion USD

      Greater Tokyo Area (2022): $1.82 Trillion USD

      Wide Spread but still all in the low Trillions

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        California is inflated by Silicon Valley stuff. Maybe left-over Hollywood prestige, as well.

        Japan isn’t known for it’s awesome economy, but it’s surprising world city Tokyo is still doing worse than all of Canada including the backwaters.

        • TheFrirish@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
          link
          fedilink
          Français
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          It’s not surprising because GDP does not reflect quality of life in any form whatsoever. GDP is not a measure of wealth it’s a measure of feverish, extractive, mindless and destructive activity.

        • FundMECFS@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Doing Worse is subjective.

          Higher GDP ≠ Doing Better.

          The US has some of the highest GDP per capita on earth but that doesn’t mean it (or its economy, if you don’t define economy just as stock market go brrr) is doing well.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            As in, doing worse economically. In this context, where that’s clear, it seems like the wording holds up.

            (or its economy, if you don’t define economy just as stock market go brrr)

            GDP measures actual trade more than the stock market. That being said, yes, it’s a litmus test, albeit a decently well supported one. The main places it breaks down, in terms of predicting people’s lifestyles, is where there’s major banking hubs (Singapore, Seychelles, Ireland for a while).

        • PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          23 hours ago

          California also offers an agricultural powerhouse of productivity, oceanfront tourism, and ongoing techbro circle jerks.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Oh right, a lot of produce that makes it up here is from California, although we’ve noticeably weaned off of it over the course of the trade war.

            I did mention the techbros. If the AI bubble pops and geopolitics breaks the walled garden monopolies it might end up a lot closer to Canada.

        • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I wonder if you take out fossil fuel and logging out of Canada’s GDP if it still would be higher than Tokyo’s. Not much logging and oil drilling going on in Tokyo I reckon.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Yes, it’s a resource-based economy. Agriculture and mining are also huge. They’re all kind of hard to get at resources, though, so it’s not like the Persian Gulf, where there’s no expenses and it’s a money printer. Basically, outside of certain parts of Ontario, people work in that instead of in factories. (And forestry in particular is being imploded by the US, right now)

            Tokyo should, in theory, have all kinds of highly skilled professionals, who earn more than whatever logging grunt. But, the gap is still like 150%.

    • deft@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Biggest question.

      Who wins in a street fight.

      I wanna give it to the Canadians on sheer variety but I think California might win that one.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          24 hours ago

          I mean, we have plenty of people living off the land in Canada too, and it’s hard land.

          If they’re allowed bringing their guns, the Americans are going to win every time, of course.

          • deft@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            16 hours ago

            That’s what I thought too but then I feel like California has more psychos. People don’t talk about it but California is the true Florida man of the US. Florida just posts it in their newspaper more but Cali has some fucking weirdos

            And crazy beats tough any day of the weak.

          • rbos@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Check out gun ownership stats for Canada sometime. Might surprise you. Lotta unregistered long guns.

            • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 hours ago

              I live in a rural area; I’m aware. Although didn’t Trudeau bring back the long gun registry?

              There’s some pretty severe restrictions, like max 5 rounds in an SKS (although plenty of people illegally use the full 10). Cali does too, but it’s not clear if it’s on the same level. IIRC you can still have handguns pretty much anywhere in the US, while they’re almost banned here.

  • blackberry28@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Makes you wonder why housing prices in Canada are so ridiculously high then when they have so much free land space.

    • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Considering we have like 9% of the world’s entire forests, where would you like us yo build these houses?

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        You can do better than that. I’m not sure how far you have to get from Calgary or Edmonton before abandoned, falling apart farmhouses start, but it might be only 45 minutes.

        And if you’re in a random part of the north, it’s more like weeks of offroading.

        Edit: Obviously, that 45 minutes is still enough to discourage most buyers. You might still be 20 from the nearest stores of any kind. So, the point stands, most of the land isn’t acceptable for most people.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Yeah, but do they like having a job and services, or are they okay alone in a run-down dry cabin with a rifle for the polar bears, and expensive resupply trucks whenever the iceroads are passable?

          • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Depends on the individual. At least one of the dudes lived in Svalbard for about a year but had to leave for family reasons so he would probably be chill with either.

            • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              11 hours ago

              Oh yeah, then sure.

              I guess the point is that the climate isn’t actually the big issue, it’s what a typical person is going to do in the middle of the arctic. If you’re a digital nomad or a researcher, it makes sense. If you’re from a local Native group, with unlimited legal hunting and a community, it makes sense.

              FWIW even within Canada, and with funding in place, it’s hard to move to the North. I know somebody who tried to retire to Whitehorse a bit ago, but couldn’t, because lots of people are interested in that and it’s nigh-impossible to get new housing approved.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Construction is the bottleneck.

      On why construction is the bottleneck, you’ll hear several theories, but just physically having land isn’t the problem.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Actually, we have no trouble finding immigrants, and mostly let in ones that are doctors or something like that (who then end up working fast food anyway).

        But yes, many of the people who were born here, and grew up somewhat acclimatised, still bitterly complain about the climate.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The developers sit on it and only develop the closest to [city] area they have until those sell at [high price] then they move to the next area they own until those sell.

      They also feel like they can get more money building single family homes than building apartments.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    So Tokyo has 1 moose, California has 100 moose, and Canada is overrun by moose. Got it!

    • comrademiao@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I doubt you’ve been or lived here if you think it’s very dense for a large city. Frankly its extremely spread out. Most buildings are quite short or single family homes. Compared to the skyscrapers of Chinese cities, its a lot closer to American suburbs.

    • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      *there is other city. Singular.

      Supposedly there is a third city, but it’s too boring to be worth checking.

          • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Please explain how that’s wrong?

            Japanese nouns don’t have grammatical number. The closest you can get is adding an affix like -tachi, but even then it’s almost exclusively for people and means more like “and company” rather than a true plural.

            The noun for “city” is 市 (“ichi”), and it can mean either one city, two cities, or many cities. You can specify how many by adding a number, but the word itself doesn’t change.

  • Malyca@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Does that mean Canada is looking for immigrants? A lot of us can help bring that number up.

      • SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Ed, it’s a startling revelation.

        Canada, getting ready to invade, has amassed 90% of its population along its border with the United States.

        The longest unprotected border in the world, stretching from the Atlantic Ocean to that other one.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Going for a remote community doesn’t actually make the process easier.

        If you happen to be a doctor willing to go somewhere that doesn’t have one, there might be special job offers, but that’s it.

    • Blurntout@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Canada is in desperate need of immigrants but simultaneously suffering some growing pains from fumbled immigration programs and policy it’s the old you won’t make everyone happy shenanigans

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      More than pretty much anywhere else, yes. It still manages to be heavily selective, though, mostly for highly educated/skilled workers and their families.

      But also, yes, the population is heavily in the south. If you showed just the non-remote part, it’d be horizontal Chile.

  • Major_Tsiom@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    And people wonder why Japan’s population is shrinking. (Wait, is it shrinking or did it stop growing?) Disinterest in breeding may be an innate response to overpopulation. In any case, Tokyo’s population is fucking crazy and decreasing the number of people voluntarily and peacefully is a GOOD thing.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      I doubt the fertility rate is much better in the scenic, middle-of-nowhere areas. People just don’t want kids, and now there’s the option to have sex without them.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      COL in Japan in general is about as unhealthy as it is in California.

      people are working themselves to death just to scrape by.

      if governments want population growth, they have to siphon wealth away from their corporate overlords and nurture the working class.

      • Drusas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Japan’s population decline isn’t really about cost of living so much as it is about poor quality of life/a stiflingly conservative culture. Terrible work/life balance, women still largely being expected to quit work when they have kids (and it being assumed that women will have kids, leading to discrimination in the workplace and limited career promotion opportunities), men still largely being expected to be salarymen who are forced to prioritize their company and social expectations at work above all else, etc.

      • PanGodofPanic@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Ironically, Tokyo has one of the lowest fertility rates in Japan. It’s only still growing because it keeps drawing in basically all of the young people from the countryside.

  • Krusty@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    14 hours ago

    But does California taste better than my cock and balls? Not really

      • Noxy@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        tokyo is not excessively populated. heavily populated, yes, but it handles its size very very well