Transcript: With a picture of a snake in the background, post reads: The chances of a human being bitten by a venomous snake is 1 in 70 thousand.

The chances of a woman being attacked by a man is 1 in 3.

And somehow, your fear of snakes is valid. But a woman’s fear of male violence is dramatic.

      • Rawrosaurus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        That’s a good question. Last time I was near a venomous snake, it was not the least bit interested in me.

        Apparently I have poor reading comprehension late at night. Bitten by non-venomous snakes? It has happened a few times. I don’t know how often it would occur though on average.

  • Sunspear@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Look, I’m all for this message, but these probabilities mean nothing without a reference - 1 in 3 of what? Per day for an average woman? Per year? Per encounter?

    Especially the per encounter would be funny, since the average person rarely sees a snake, let alone a venomous one. And I imagine women usually meet at least three men a day…

    • Wren@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Without a reference time period we can assume it’s within a lifetime.

    • velma@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Statistics show that globally about 1 in 3 (32%) women experience physical or sexual violence in their lifetime, with the vast majority of these assaults perpetrated by men. [12]

      • Sunspear@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Huh, thanks! Yknow, while this is still a horrible statistic, I’m kind of relieved it’s not 32% a year, that’d amount to a lot higher total

        • Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Using probabilities, that would basically lead to 100% of women being assaulted within their lifetime. Its definitely not per year.

        • Sophienomenal@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Keep in mind that this only counts the first occurrence. Women in abusive relationships will only count as 1 instance despite experiencing violence and/or sexual assault regularly over a long period of time. This is also likely an underestimate, as not everyone wants to admit that they were the victim of violence, and some of us get gaslit by others so hard that we no longer even believe we’re a victim at all—that it was somehow our fault.

    • Wren@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You missed the second part of that, the being called dramatic part. You sure this is the right community for you?

  • imeansurewhynot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    is this a “preaching to the choir” thing? Most people here must disagree with violence against women just being"drama".

    Are you trying to raise awareness?

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Sometimes it’s preaching to the choir, some times its affirmation. shrug

      Edit nvm, saw the debacle. Arf arf little sealion. Can’t have women having communities and discussions now, can we.

    • velma@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You can view it as a “preaching to the choir” thing if you’d like.

      You’re welcome to ignore posts that don’t resonate with you or topics you don’t want to comment on.

      • imeansurewhynot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        yes, that is how public forums work…hence my question.

        If you don’t know the answer to a question, you don’t have to pretend to answer an ancillary concern nobody is asking about, it’s okay.

        • Nora (She/Her)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yes, public forums usually have rules! hence it is recommended you read those before asking questions!

          If you don’t know how to read the rules, you don’t have to pretend like you did! Nobody is asking for your opinion, its okay!

          • imeansurewhynot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            No, you avoided answering my question by responding “you can view it as a” preaching to the choir" thing if you’d like", which is a negative response, not an affirmative.

            Now you’ve amended your earlier response to provide an answer. No gas-fiddling on my watch, velma!

            • velma@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 hours ago

              I personally view it as bringing up a relevant topic in this group, but that doesn’t mean it’s inaccurate to view it as “preaching to the choir”.

              • imeansurewhynot@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                yea, both interpretations are correct.

                That’s your alt account?

                Arr you also Butterfly? I mean, you don’t have to get into that, but is that why you’re speaking for the OP?

                • velma@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  Hey now you’ve crossed the line here. No, Wren and Lady Butterfly are not alt accounts. Women exist on the internet, I know it’s shocking.

    • Wren@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Not anymore than you’re trying to troll.

      You sure you know where you’re posting?

        • velma@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Rules…

          Women only… trans women are women, and transphobic or gender critical talk isn’t allowed. Anyone under the trans umbrella (e.g. non-binary, bigender, agender) is free to decide whether a women’s community is a good fit for them.

          Don’t be a dick. No personal attacks, no aggression, play nice.

          • imeansurewhynot@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            So you don’t follow the rules and then quote them at others?

            you aren’t playing very nice.

            If this community is not a good fit for you, why are you participating?