Ad hominem fallacy is when the person is attacked as an invalidation of an argument.
You were defending the ethics of drinking cow’s milk, so talking about the ethics of drinking cow’s milk is perfectly on topic and not a fallacy. Otherwise, you’d be able to claim ad hominem on ANY counterargument!
lmao I wasn’t attacking your person (I am now though lol) I was calling your act entitled, based on the argument before. Yeah if you think you’re entitled to kill anothers child and take her milk, that’s entitlement. Literally the definition lmfao, begging redditors to actually look up the terms they use
between you drinking tea without milk and mom losing her child for said milk your “sacrifice” seems kinda like just entitlement.
Straight to ad hominem - nothing of value to engage with here.
Ad hominem fallacy is when the person is attacked as an invalidation of an argument.
You were defending the ethics of drinking cow’s milk, so talking about the ethics of drinking cow’s milk is perfectly on topic and not a fallacy. Otherwise, you’d be able to claim ad hominem on ANY counterargument!
lmao I wasn’t attacking your person (I am now though lol) I was calling your act entitled, based on the argument before. Yeah if you think you’re entitled to kill anothers child and take her milk, that’s entitlement. Literally the definition lmfao, begging redditors to actually look up the terms they use