Always bring a bomb to a gunfight
The caliber one seems silly. A 9mm is .35 inches but has about the same power of a .45 but a .357 is more powerful than both
Oh man, caliber debates. This shit is way more complicated than just X is more powerful than Y
And a .308 would smoke them all. It was specifying if you see smaller caliber, assume rifle.
That’s not at all what it’s specifying. It says “don’t carry a handgun with a caliber lower than .40”
It’s pro-45ACP / anti-9mm boomer gun shit. I have no clue where you’re getting this “smaller means rifle” from the image posted. Like yeah, typically smaller means rifle, but that’s not at all what the image says.
it’s just the usual “hurr durr anything smaller than .45 is for girls” bullshit. Usually espoused by the sort of ancient old farts who remember carrying one in WWII, Korea, or Vietnam; and who dislike the general shift to smaller bullets going faster because they don’t understand terminal ballistics.
As a psych nurse my rules for a gunfight are that the ER security checkpoint with the metal detector and x-ray bag scanner better have found and removed the gun by the time the patient arrives on my unit. One day they didn’t and I was VERY put out. Absolutely miffed. I wrote a very stern email in the morning.
I know there’s a necromancer who favours a 0.577 revolver for the finality of the effect
Caliber of every gun in the picture starts with a “.2”
But they aren’t hand guns?
anything worth shooting is worth shooting twice
I’m just imagining a hunter double tapping a dead duck point blank with scatter shot
TBF it does say ‘rules for a gunfight’ and not ‘rules for a duck hunt’. If the duck is part of an armed offensive, and possibly wearing body armor, I think a double tap is appropriate.
