Some of the worst LLM takes I’ve seen in a while. I’ve never thought FLOSS would be taken over by proprietary torment nexuses so fast.

The discussion will probably continue behind closed doors, so the public has no way of knowing who says what and corporations have their way easier.

And someone got exposed for being a Nazi.

  • mholiv@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I don’t get the fuss here. The KDE LLM policy is essentially the same as the Linux kernel. Aka human driven, human responsible, LLM assisted coding.

    Unless you are running KDE on NetBSD you where already using LLM assisted code.

  • Dimand@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    LLM usage

    The golden rule for LLM usage in KDE is Don’t be lazy:

    Don’t try to use a tool to replace your own judgment, interpersonal communication, or learning process.

    Don’t take unsustainable shortcuts.

    Don’t avoid growing as a person.

    The result will be poor-quality work that eventually becomes someone else’s problem.

    Nobody in KDE should know if you use an LLM — not because you’re concealing it, but because your usage of it produces output indistinguishable from what you could produce yourself. Contributions with obvious and lazy LLM usage may be ignored or closed.

    Are we reading that same thing? Hardly seems like a pro LLM stance or the worst take that could be made.

    • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 hours ago

      A majority of KDE developers are determined to create an LLM policy that allows AI code submissions without any form of disclosure to “avoid shaming”, and appear to be completely dismissing any ethical, environmental, or copyright concerns brought up.