Isn’t that exactly what sardonicism is? I would count it as form of humour even if its bitter and full of negativity.

It’s a little more pain […] oriented

Oh good… just what I wanted.

I think its hilarious that some people seem to actually take this science fiction variation on Pascal’s wager seriously.

Already did that some time ago but I am still in the dataset.

Love you too, kitten. ♥️

Yes, performance is one reason. Clean architecture uses indirect calls a lot. This doesn’t really matter if you are doing IO bound work like reading files and calling databases, but games do a lot of CPU bound work as well to simulate physics and update game state where all that indirection will waste CPU cycles.

I also can’t really think about a part of a game engine that I would put into the domain layer. The domain layer is the whole reason this architectural pattern exists and if you can’t define that clearly there isn’t a reason to use clean architecture.

The less you read of Uncle Bobs writings the better but Clean Architecture isn’t really his idea(the original was called Ports and Adapters) its just a name that he coined and it unfortunately stuck.

I think Clean Architecture is quite useful for the kinds of long-lived application development projects that you will usually encounter in larger companies. Its main appeal in my opinion is that it prevents your domain logic from becoming entangled with implementation details of the environment in which the software will run. This makes changing out dependencies easier in case you need to switch out some 3rd party services.

Another benefit of using such a well-known architecture in general is that you will have an easier time on-boarding new developers. In a clean architecture project it should be no question where to find, for example, the database context because it will obviously live in the infrastructure layer.

A drawback of this approach is that it can make an application more complex than it needed to be, especially if you are writing a smallish CRUD application that has little to no domain logic.

To me the clean architecture is a good default to start with for monolithic business applications, where requirements might change drastically in the future, but as with anything else it doesn’t fit every use case. So, don’t try to write the next high performance game engine with it.

No, I don’t think that’s it. Judging from your response its more likely that you are being obtuse on purpose.

In every single thread about people not liking AI you are there, being angry about people not liking AI. Whats the point? There are plenty of online communities for AI enjoyers like you. Try Hackernews they glaze AI all day long.

Not even Haskell is safe from the endless pushing of AI slop. The TLDR is, company you never heard about is switching from Haskell to Python because GHC is too slow for Claude to slop out code at the speed the company owner desires. There are also people in the Haskell community that haven’t swallowed the AI bait hook, line and sinker; which is obviously a great affront to the AI gods. Of course, no AI psychosis induced breakdown is complete with the tired old “AI is here to stay and…”, can’t have people actually think on their own now can we.

Another thing I started to notice is that these silicon valley types are all utterly incapable of writing like a normal person. Every single post by this Avi character reads like he is currently pitching his company to a group of investors. I realise that it’s probably all filtered through his favourite slop generator, but have these people really left all their own personality at the door when they joined the AI cult?

deleted by creator

The first number only indicates the Qt framework version Plasma is based on. You can treat the second number as the actual major version of Plasma 6.

I agree that Wayland has massive accessibility deficits but it certainly doesn’t help if the talonvoice developer shuts down attempts to improve the situation with “Wayland is not supported.”.

I think they added AOT with .NET 6 and they are supporting Linux ever since the .Net Framework, .NET Core split.

You can use C# for pretty much anything the question is how convenient it is to do so. There are even some people who try to use .NET with embedded systems. I would use C++ only in cases where performance is the most important aspect of the product and even that niche grows smaller and smaller as time marches on. For example, at my current job we are using C# to implement some pretty intense image processing algorithms. Initially we wanted to use C++ for the performance critical parts, but we are still well within our performance targets using C# alone.

When you don’t want to depend on .NET runtime.

There is an option for that in .NET.

First of all why are you digging up a 4 month old topic? About your quote, very cool never heard that one before…

Lets take a look at the thousands of dead directly caused by the actions of the Putin and his ilk. Just to make it really simple for the dumbest tankies at the back of the class. Russia invaded an independent nation. They are abducting children from said nation. They kill civilians without mercy. The DKP, instead of standing up to imperialism, makes idiotic statements about NATO expanding aggressively eastwards as if those countries didn’t join voluntarily for a good reason. That parties ideology distills down to “America bad, therefore Russia good” and it never changed. So I stand with what I said.

So how would I create such an “Open Source” model? They don’t share the data used to create them do they? Let’s not even get started on how much computing power I would need to train one of those things. These selfhosted models solve nothing except some data privacy issues. Sure you no longer send all your code to a shady AI company but you are still 100% dependent on them sharing their models.

Its the GNOME car! Brought to you by EmmanueleBassi and named accordingly…