Lutris maintainer use AI generated code for some time now. The maintainer also removed the co-authorship of Claude, so no one knows which code was generated by AI.
Anyway, I was suspecting that this “issue” might come up so I’ve removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what’s generated and what is not.
Goddamn… I just switched to Lutris because Faugus launcher was throwing me errors when trying to launch certain games…
Even worse, i just realized I can’t simply uninstall Lutris because it comes preinstalled with bazzite.
There is AI code in the Linux kernel now, I don’t think it’s realistic to go full vegan on AI.
Show me a source for that, would you?
See my other comment
I don’t believe this is true. Do you have a source for that claim?
Sure, here is the official guidance: https://kernel.org/doc/html//next/process/coding-assistants.html
And here is a search that finds some of the AI commits: https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Atorvalds%2Flinux+"Assisted-by"&type=commits
And here is an interview with Linus Torvalds, where he says he’s a huge believer in AI and explains how it makes work on the kernel easier: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-_8YliVS4E
Thank for that. Doesn’t seem to be very widespread at present…BTW some of those results in the GH search aren’t AI commits, they’re either solutions based on a problem found by an AI reviewing tool or the assistant is someone’s personal bundle of scripts (aka
gkh_clanker_2000).Source: people are lazy and follow the path of least resistance. History repeats itself, and it is no different for Linux.
Some people are lazy. Other people are not.
Bazzite user here as well, I’m not sure what game(s) you were using lutris for but I started out using it because as you said it was pre installed. I switched over to bottles a couple of weeks ago and found great success, hopefully bottles can work for you too.