Lutris maintainer use AI generated code for some time now. The maintainer also removed the co-authorship of Claude, so no one knows which code was generated by AI.
Anyway, I was suspecting that this “issue” might come up so I’ve removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what’s generated and what is not.
Sure, here is the official guidance: https://kernel.org/doc/html//next/process/coding-assistants.html
And here is a search that finds some of the AI commits: https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Atorvalds%2Flinux+"Assisted-by"&type=commits
And here is an interview with Linus Torvalds, where he says he’s a huge believer in AI and explains how it makes work on the kernel easier: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-_8YliVS4E
Thank for that. Doesn’t seem to be very widespread at present…BTW some of those results in the GH search aren’t AI commits, they’re either solutions based on a problem found by an AI reviewing tool or the assistant is someone’s personal bundle of scripts (aka
gkh_clanker_2000).