• Newsteinleo@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      In this day and age Motorola knows people will pay extra for privacy and the convenience of not having to install an OS on their phone.

  • k0k0_belgium
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    Needing specific phones to run an OS is one of the greatest failures of the modern mobile ecosystem.

  • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    5 days ago

    i mean everything would be higher than pixels because google heavily subsidises pixels to get their data collection in your hands.

    • quick_snail@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I can’t complain. I love buying old pixels for $100.

      When you strip out the google bloat, they run great!

      • exdor@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah and they are insecure and probably have very short and incomplete software updates

        Phones are sadly not general purpose computers

        • refalo@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          If they’re insecure then there is an easy way to exploit it to root/flash it with a better OS if that wasn’t already possible. Not everyone wants to drop $900 on a hunk of plastic.

          • exdor@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            It is easier to break something than to reverse engineer drivers and firmware and maintain yourself XD

            Also, firmware updates need to be signed so it is impossible to update, unless there is a really bad vulnerability

            And you can buy phones used, my most expensive one was under 400€

  • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    You usually buy phones intended for custom roms used, so the release price doesnt really matter imo. The question is how longlived will they be. Swappable battery? Stuff like that.

    • exdor@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      True. For this specific case dont expect low used prices.

      Experts take care and dont sell their devices.

      Dumb people buy the new phone and then sell it because they switched to an iPhone or something… dumb. That is why there are so many low-spec Pixels on the used market. Try finding a 500gb Pixel pro used!

      Same will be the case with used top tier Motorola phones. Lower userbase and those people are less likely to sell them.

      A Pixel 9/10 is kinda premium but the normal one. The a is the lower tier but also runs GrapheneOS. But the a is not the generally advertized model for cheaper, it is released separately and has obvious downsides because you always have a direct comparison. It is simply way less likely for people to buy “the regular Pixel” (which is kinda premium) than for people to buy the top tier Motorola

    • Turret3857@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      If Graphene is in control of production in any way: Probably about 7 or more years of support

      If Motorola is in control: it may be DOA

      Not wanting that to happen but Motorola’s track record is NOT good at all for that kind of thing.

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    Considering that GrapheneOS runs on devices as old and cheap as Pixel 6, and previously supported earlier versions too, the refusal to produce cheaper models seems almost malicious.

    GrapheneOS does not require fancy hardware besides a security chip.

    • exdor@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, their requirements increased since Pixels got arm memory tagging in the 8 generation. The 11 would be more secure than a 7 for example but they are still uncertain about supporting them, because it is a clear security downgrade

    • Stowaway@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 days ago

      My suspicion is that this is partially risk based pricing for Motorola. They know some people value privacy, but they aren’t banking on lots. So if they’re putting the work in on this they want to see the value back.

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        Fair, but, as per the article, these devices will ship without GrapheneOS, so they’ll be mostly focused on regular consumers. This is not some GrapheneOS-first model, even if they’ve done some work to assist GrapheneOS project.

  • refalo@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Will these still be considered “criminal phones” by the governments that already make that claim against GrapheneOS users?

  • Defectus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Saw this the other day. Bought a new battery for my nothing phone 1. Gonna install evolutionX vanilla tomorrow on it. Hopeful that it’ll last a couple of years more.