I don’t get it. Why is she still paying lip service to AIPAC?

Or is she really just an islamophobic, genocidal bitch?

If you’re using a shared IP, it doesn’t matter.

You are using a VPN or Tor, right?!?

Usually its a sign of a scam. Looks like a ransomware c2 domain

The same people who gamble for hours or days in casinos.

It’s a disease.

I think it’s just everyone trying to speculate on trash. Some do profit from it. Most get fucked.

Meh, better they get ordered to become Nationalized, all their IP licensed GNU, a budget allocated for their maintenance, data harvesting stripped, and anyone can submit PRs.

True public infrastructure.

In my future utopia, the homeless are living in hollowed-out data centers.

Link?

Pete Hegseths a fuckin’ douch

Pete Hegseths a fuckin’ douch

This narrative is pissing me off. They’re both war crimes, but the second one is a bigger war crime.

Pete Hegseths a fuckin’ douch

Can we send him on a one-way mission to the Hague, tho?

That’s fine.

Monero it is then

They’re talking about domestic law. I’m talking about international law

Again, it doesn’t fucking matter what the US says. What matters is what the ICC and ICJ says.

Please stop spreading misinformation. Then narrative that US laws matter might even be spreading disinformation

Under the Nuremberg Principles, war crimes are different from crimes against peace. Crimes against peace include planning, preparing, initiating, or waging a war of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements, or assurances. Because the definition of a state of “war” may be debated, the term “war crime” itself has seen different usage under different systems of international and military law. It has some degree of application outside of what some may consider being a state of “war”, but in areas where conflicts persist enough to constitute social instability.
…
War crimes also include such acts as mistreatment of prisoners of war or civilians
…
War crimes also included deliberate attacks on citizens and property of neutral states, such as the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. As the attack on Pearl Harbor happened while the U.S. and Japan were at peace and without a just cause for self-defense, the attack was declared by the Tokyo Trials to go beyond justification of military necessity and therefore constituted a war crime.

From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_crime

Stop spreading misinformation. The ICC and ICJ don’t give a shit if the country considers itself at war. These are war crimes because it was a military that executed it.

If it were police doing extra judicial killing, then it would be called Crimes Against Humanity.

You are the problem

When a military kills civilians, it is absolutely a war crime.