https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share/desktop/north-america/#monthly-200901-202607
Cloudflare stats also seem to support peaks of 15% usage but around 9-10% on average.
The trendline suggests this is just the start.
The spike likely represents Statcounter being too slow to adjust their methods of filtering out bot page views after some brand new web scrapers appeared on the scene hoovering up all the data for AI training. 10% linux market share would be a cosmic event. You would hear about it in mainstream media if it were really happening.
IIRC this was debunked some time ago, it’s related to a change in OSX/MacOS that’s causing Apple devices to show up as Linux.
This makes more sense, that graph doesn’t pass the sniff test. I’d be looking for some other explanation than suddenly Linux use spiked almost 3X.
Thing is you can often debunk any of these graphs for the same reason. Just a minority of Linux systems actually show up as Linux as the users are usually more inclined to block a lot of stuff for privacy reasons, then often also changing the user agent most tests fall back to.
Oh shit, is this it? Is this actually the year of the Linux desktop?
The year you install Linux on your desktop is the year of the Linux desktop. It’s different for everybody.
Seriously… there will never be a wide-spread year of the Linux desktop. Because that would require lobbying and investments to get devices with pre-installed Linux by default to the clueless majority that doesn’t actually know what an OS is anyway.
And once a Linux distro goes commercial to fill that requirement it is incentivised to implement all the usual crap and enshittification that are missing in Linux normally.
This graphic: fuck BSD in particular
Well, Netcraft just confirmed it
BSD has been a victim of many things including its own license. I don’t intentionally run any systems with BSD currently. But it definitely doesn’t get the love it should. Again part of that is down to the license lol. But there are plenty of appliances silently running it without people ever knowing.
If it hadn’t been for those lawsuits in the late 80s early 90s over the validity of the Berkeley software distribution even existing. Linux probably would have stayed a hobby project. And everyone would be running a flavor of BSD now. But between that, the gpl, and linux. They never really got the chance.
Next year, I’m telling you, it’s going to be the year of the BSD desktop.
There’s no way that’s accurate, right?
None of those graph ever are. Because Linux users are more prone to tinkering, keeping stuff private and blocking a lot of bullshit scripting, there is big dark area of Linux systems listing themselves as something else (usually Windows because of those asshole websites not playing well with Linux by design without an actual valid reason other than “we don’t like Linux”).
(PS: For the same reason a lot of sites believe I’m using Chrome. I don’t but I know they like to fuck with me when they see that Firefox user agent.)
Quite likely. Many Linux distros aren’t visible because they hide their telemetry, and would be marked as ‘unknown’ - or they spoof Windows or Mac for compatibility reasons. It’d be impossible to get an accurate read on how many computers run Linux, but it’ll be higher than the number that report it.
AFAIK they get their data through crowd-sourced browser header data. And I really doubt any significant number of people are manipulating that.
https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/user-agent-switcher-for-c/djflhoibgkdhkhhcedjiklpkjnoahfmg has over a million users on Chrome alone. It’s possibly more common than you think.
“Looking at browser headers” usually means they’re parsing the User-Agent string, which all kind of people (and bots) spoof for all kinds of reasons. There even used to (and might still) be a Firefox extension that would generate random ones.
There’s also a question of where they’re measuring this.
You can’t intercept and inspect the browser telemetry of every web request on the entire internet, that’s just not possible. So they must only have access to the data from requests from a specific set of websites.
Are those websites a representative sample of all web traffic, or are some of those websites more or less likely to have Linux users than the average website?
And it seems to be counting per request. Do Linux users visit these websites more often or less often than average? Do they spend more time there and view more pages, or less time and less pages?
A truly unbiased OS survey is basically impossible. At least, hopefully, they’re using the same measurement data over and over again through time, so maybe the trends in the data are still meaningful.
The Cloudflare chart would probably be pretty representative given how much traffic goes through it.
It may not look like a big deal but it wasn’t too long ago Windows was like 95% of the OS market.
In this context what is the difference between macOS and OS X? I can’t help but feel that is like listing Windows 10 separately.
Speaking for myself, I suppose, I had a server running a much older version of Mac OS X (10.15) simply because I couldn’t update it beyond a certain point. Only recently did I finally install Fedora on it. Technically, I would be listed on this statistic as moving away from OS X to Linux. But such a huge market share for OS X vs macOS? That doesn’t make sense.
That leads me to believe it’s a matter of web browser reporting, and some report macOS as either “macOS” or “Mac OS X” depending on the browser, but they really mean the same thing.
I was kinda wondering if X was representative of 10.x releases but then it didn’t make sense to me for it to be so much higher than the newer OSs either.
That’s what I thought at first, too, but i remembered that these statistics are typically gathered via browser machine id reporting, so…
Safari probably reports as “macOS“ and I bet Firefox and chrome report as “Mac OS X“
I’m so excited now that I have time again to start tinkering with Linux ✌️
The MKBHD effect?
