It’s not a whataboutism to ask you to acknowledge the principals behind how GHG targets are set via an example when you’re using a simplistic bar to attack another one.
Guess your answer is no, you aren’t going to engage in good faith. Bye.
If all you care about is meeting commitments, the US doesn’t have any more commitments so I guess they are doing fine?? The commitments for China were low because that was all they could get China to agree to. These commitments don’t mean anything
It’s not a whataboutism to ask you to acknowledge the principals behind how GHG targets are set via an example when you’re using a simplistic bar to attack another one.
Guess your answer is no, you aren’t going to engage in good faith. Bye.
If all you care about is meeting commitments, the US doesn’t have any more commitments so I guess they are doing fine?? The commitments for China were low because that was all they could get China to agree to. These commitments don’t mean anything