• Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 年前

    Oil companies: “It’S nOt Us! If YoU dIdN’t BuY tHe OiL tHeN wE WoUlDnT sElL iT!”

    (Politician introduces bill to cut emissions and reduce oil usage)

    Oil Companies: “REEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!! Not like that!! Quick, fund Republicans and anti-climate change “science” we can’t have them switching to anything else!!”

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 年前

    I don’t think anything positive would be accomplished by taking all of the companies’ money and arresting their executives. Arresting the executives won’t do anything because they would just hire new executives. If you bankrupt the companies, other companies will emerge to take their place, so long as there is a demand for the product.

    • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 年前

      Induced Demand exists and fossil infrastructure keeps nominal cost down, while externalising fossil impact.

      Big Fossil must pay, consumers must pay (those who can’t switch must be helped) because climate costs will appear anyways and they must be paid to keep civilisation afloat eventually.

      Fossil fuel that is too cheap is a regulatory issue of internalising true costs of burning fossil fuels.

    • OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 年前

      And those companies, with the right laws on the books, would hopefully think twice about breaking said laws for fear of their executives going to jail.

      Potential executives would think twice about joining companies that might be prone to being sent to jail.

      This example always gets brought up, that people will just replace them, but they won’t if we de-incentive it and continue to enforce it. You can’t stop murder, but you can make it easier to catch murderers and place enough consequences that the average person doesn’t feel inclined to commit it. Sure, then there’s career criminals, there’s people who would see that punishment and still go for it, but note that the number would be drastically reduced than if we just let them continue on unimpeded.