Example of a KDE dev not wanting environmental concerns to play any role, despite KDE having an environmental project:
Devs rejecting any notion of transparency by disclosing AI usage in code submissions (in direct opposition to advice from the FSFE):
And all of this is coming right after the debacle with an AI slop project being allowed to give a presentation at Akademy, and the person asking how this was allowed being blocked by KDE:
https://lemmy.nz/post/42029517
as well as the discussion thread bringing up legitimate concerns about AI usage being closed:
https://discuss.kde.org/t/sorry-to-bring-up-a-contentious-topic-kde-ai-llm-policy/46333/164
As someone who genuinely loves KDE, and has even donated to the project multiple times, I sadly have to accept that the majority of KDE have hopped onto the Pro-AI train, and they will not be dissuaded otherwise.
No, I’m not. The GNOME project have not, from what I’ve seen, drawn any hard boundary on the matter.
Lacking any clear policy prohibiting AI slop in the project, it’s still entirely feasible they’ll let it in.
I haven’t confirmed it but this screenshot claims they banned it
That person seems to be mistaken. I could only find policies for GNOME Circle and extensions, and those seem similar in spirit to the one proposed here:
From the second link:
Yes. I’d argue that this is similar in spirit to the linked proposal, which for example requires that