To be fair, he truths that Iran has agreed and proposed a plan, and truths nothing about what he himself did. Which I would assume to be weaseling if I expected him to be at least that smart
I’m not sure if I understand what you mean. The point is that Trump mentions Iran’s 10 points as workable, this isn’t to say he agreed to everything but that he’d consider that as a basis. He then acted as if they had always been talking about the US’ list instead. These two narratives are incompatible without an explanation, he either agreed to work on a deal based on Iran’s terms as a basis or he didn’t.
Whether he always planned to betray them again or whether he changed his mind because he looked weak considering Iran’s terms I don’t know.
To be fair, he truths that Iran has agreed and proposed a plan, and truths nothing about what he himself did. Which I would assume to be weaseling if I expected him to be at least that smart
He wrote. Truth as a word has a definition that is rarely applicable to him
I mean, to me using truth as a verb, and especially applied to him looked funny as hell
I’m not sure if I understand what you mean. The point is that Trump mentions Iran’s 10 points as workable, this isn’t to say he agreed to everything but that he’d consider that as a basis. He then acted as if they had always been talking about the US’ list instead. These two narratives are incompatible without an explanation, he either agreed to work on a deal based on Iran’s terms as a basis or he didn’t.
Whether he always planned to betray them again or whether he changed his mind because he looked weak considering Iran’s terms I don’t know.
But the bruh above which you seem to be defending said: