Maybe because of post body being an ad instead of something useful

The way I heard it, it was mostly to satisfy copyright requirements, albeit destructive scanning is easier, indeed

They had issues before LLMs, so maybe that’s not what happened internally

I haven’t read the article at all yet, but for me the office is good for socialising and preventing overtime. It’s hard for me to keep track of time sometimes, getting easier when I don’t work from home.

Of course, that is still something that can be had at home too

Well, scamming was plain English hacking before the invention of electricity, so maybe we’re just back to the basics

Yeah, some of the ‘hacking’ allegation are amazing, so maybe we will one day see ‘my agent was asked to drop database by a page I was scraping without permission’ lawsuits.

Same with Fishfighter, sounds much closer to the truth, and I can’t stop imagining a person wrestling with a large tuna or catfish in a shallow water

Oh, they would never

We were hiring in Spain and took way longer, and CV often looked better than the candidate, and we don’t even do stupid shit like live coding or homework projects

Bad tenants and people who want to rent exist, but the rest I don’t agree with

I expect that corporations will not sue for copyright infringement because that would set precedent that would make themselves susceptible to being sued for the same infringement. Bit contemporary copyright law looks like a trash fire to me, so I am in no position to predict anything

That doesn’t sound bad, but usually when you have a device you can modify it to remove any signals visible from the outside

1.68 TB recommended RAM 😅

I assumed you want to make person unidentifiable, in which case tone and pitch changes will not erase enough of biometrics.

If you want to make it sound like someone specific, then it’s exactly what you said in the last line, you need to train your own spoofing models. Also you sound like you want to do something I can’t endorse, so it’s good that you don’t want to train a model

That seems to be the current line of defense — no legal claims means the owner can delete what they want to delete

I expected it to be a jest, but they look serious. It might even not be too bad of a language in other circumstances

I don’t think so, albeit this is a possibility and should be considered

Their repositories are really something, and the commits seem to only happen in bursts, I expected them to do a few commits every day, instead it’s like 10 days a year with 1700+ commits total.

But I wouldn’t assume they are conventionally malicious, more like a paperclip storage optimiser

You’re joking, but people drive under influence not because alcohol exists, but because they have issues with self-control and responsibility.

So you do prove a point while trying to oppose it, imo

Yeah, there are 10 types of people