• AeonFelis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Yes, both parties suck, and you are allowed to dislike both, but they don’t suck equally and not (completely) in the same way and you are obliged to decide for yourself which party sucks harder, which you dislike more, and most importantly - which are you the most scared of getting into power.

    Just because you don’t want to be neither leftist nor rightist doesn’t mean you need to aim for the dead center. That’s as dogmatic as aiming for one of the extremes, and in fact dumber because it’s not even motivated by any ideology.

  • dwalin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    Psa: when reading the comments remember that maga want you demotivated and to stay home and just take it. Because they will vote, and they will not split their vote.

  • chloroken@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Pizzacake, .world, and hundreds of politically-incoherent comments. I can’t imagine a better way to take a shit.

  • Linkalee@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    Here’s the thing: When you don’t vote, you COULD be saying that both candidates are bad, and you don’t like either of them…

    Or you could be saying that both candidates are great, and you love both of them. That you’re sure either of them will do an equally good job of running the country, so it doesn’t matter who wins.

    And if you don’t feel that way, then you need to VOTE

    • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      Here’s the thing, when both of your parents beat you within an inch of your life, you COULD be saying that both are bad and you don’t want either of them to have custody.

      Or you could be saying both parents are great and you love both of them. That you’re sure either of them will do an equally good job of raising you, so it doesn’t matter who gets custody.

      And if you don’t feel that way, you have to pick one!

      • InputZero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        7 days ago

        Acting like not voting at all would fix anything is a huge part of the problem. Yeah the Democrats not going to do anything, but you know what that means, the Democrats won’t do anything. They won’t embarass America on the world stage every day, they won’t fund the Gestapo to assault minorities and they won’t threaten allies with invasion.

        Sure the Democrats suck, the whole damn system sucks but it’s a whole lot better for a whole lot of people when the Republicans are not in charge.

        • 7101334@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          They won’t embarass America on the world stage every day, they won’t fund the Gestapo to assault minorities and they won’t threaten allies with invasion.

          Yaaay we get decorum and stability at home so we can ignore the Palestinians / Yemenis / Somalis / etc being bombed overseas! Hopefully the bomb will even be dropped by a diverse team under the Dems!

          • GladiusB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            7 days ago

            That’s a single issue. I agree it’s shitty all around. But there are hundreds of issues that are more important. Namely allowing children to be molested, people dying from not having healthcare, and deporting parents and stranding children just to name a few.

            It’s shitty all around. It’s even shittier when it turns into a pissing contest of shittiness.

            • untorquer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              Palestinians / Yemenis / Somalis / etc

              I’m confused how supporting and engaging in genocide and bombing humans in multiple countries with unique circumstances is both a single issue separate to and less important than doing the same (without bombs) nearer to home.

              I guess everyone has a different tolerance for blood on their hands…

              • GladiusB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                7 days ago

                Imagine you have a house that is managed by landlords. The landlords have changed ownership and management many times and allowed the plumbing and heating and electricity to become inoperable. Now there are termites.

                At some point management put in an HOA and made it so the HOA kicks your neighbors out without any consideration.

                We have bigger internal issues. It ain’t my blood. All Americans are fully aware we should not be financing anything like that.

            • Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              7 days ago

              constant international war mongering and bombing innocents is a single issue? and not even a major one for you?

              jfc death to amerikkka

              • MortUS@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                7 days ago

                and Russia, and China, and every 1st world country of similar size. Wake up sheeple!

                We are living through a time of international tug of war on political influence, resources, and land.

            • 7101334@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              7 days ago
              1. Joe Biden had the files and did not release them, so miss me with the “only dems will save the kids” shit
              2. I don’t know why you’re implying we need to pick one or the other, but claiming that (at most) 100 - 200 western children being molested takes precedence over thousands of Palestinian children being murdered displays your white supremacist mindset.
              3. Parents being deported and stranding children is terrible. It is not more terrible than parents being murdered and children being murdered. What the fuck are you talking about?
        • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          7 days ago

          I wouldn’t advocate for not voting, voting third party would be my advice if you don’t want to personally get involved in politics.

          • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            7 days ago

            voting third party would be my advice

            Hope that advice only applies to local/state elections, cuz voting 3rd party for president is about as useful as an asshole on your elbow.

            • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              17
              ·
              7 days ago

              The only reason its as ineffective as it is now is because of people like you spend a ridiculous amount of time and effort shaming those who might consider it.

              Saying a third party couldn’t win is factually incorrect, yet its a common phrase on here isn’t it.

              • brianary@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                7 days ago

                Only once has a third party candidate made much progress, and Perot was right-wing/libertarian. You can’t skip right to a third party presidential candidate without making progress with that party locally first, then in Congress. That just how this system works. You can pretend that enough people will spontaneously vote for your same third party candidate, but that’s a demonstrably a fantasy. You can claim that a vote reflects on your own morality rather than something strategic and practical, but that’s a view pushed by people hoping to take advantage of youth vanity and split the vote.

                • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  You can’t skip right to a third party presidential candidate without making progress with that party locally first

                  I swear to God. It’s like trying to tell a child you can’t have ice cream because you’re stranded on a desert island and they KEEP INSISTING that they want ice cream.

                  It’s infuriating.

                  Like, it isn’t complicated. You can’t start at the beginning of a board game, roll a 6, and move your piece 57 spaces to the end and win. That’s impossible.

                  It’s wild how many Americans exist outside reality.

                • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  Sort of, probability isn’t a set thing, and everyone analyzes it differently. Part of the reason it seems so improbable is because people keep saying it is.

                  The reality is though that the majority want either a republican or democrat, because a majority think America is a good country that just needs a little bit better leadership. I disagree with that assessment, and I won’t vote D or R again.

              • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                7 days ago

                Saying a third party couldn’t win is factually incorrect

                Oh, you like facts?

                Here’s one.

                In the 2024 election the 3rd party presidential candidate with the most votes only got 0.5% of the total votes cast.

                So it is FACTUALLY CORRECT to state a 3rd party can’t win the presidency.

                Like, what do you not grasp here? No 3rd party has done the work to become nationally viable. No 3rd party even has a SINGLE member in Congress. It is ACTUALLY IMPOSSIBLE for a 3rd party candidate to win the presidency anytime in the remotely near future. It would take YEARS and YEARS for a 3rd party to become a household name and get members in Congress and actually have a shot at the presidency.

                Therefore, voting for a 3rd party candidate for president is akin to wiping your ass with your ballot, smelling it and thinking it smells nice, then flushing it down the toilet.

      • Jhex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        Voting D is not the cure for cancer but it seems to be a viable chemo treatment… voting R is like feeding the cancer with yellow #5 and plutonium

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        Dems gave me affordable healthcare when I was young and poor.

        Last Dem was progressive as fuck, but everyone focused on his age because the TV told them to.

        Voting records show Dems regularly vote in favor of average Americans and have for a long, long time.

        Sorry bud, reality disagrees with your feelings.

        Just because a party isn’t perfect doesn’t mean they aren’t beneficial.

      • stardust@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        So you are suggesting things would be the exact same if Trump hadn’t been voted in and that you were completely content and fine with a Trump presidency and Republicans holding all branches of power.

        You are as much a Trump support as MAGA taking the side of downplaying how bad he is. No different in fact than smart Trump supporters readjusting their message of downplaying criticisms and trying to convince the left to not vote because both sides are equally bad, so please don’t vote.

        Very smart right wing strategy of hiding their allegiance acting like they are a leftist, but doing what they can to discourage voting and trying to convince people both are bad since they know they can’t win them over to the right. So next thing is don’t vote.

  • eronth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I would love to get away from our current 2 party system…

    But until then please we have to stop electing the tyrant side.

  • InvalidName2@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    7 days ago

    In person, I don’t really see a whole lot of people in the US admitting or claiming that they didn’t or don’t vote.

    I do, however, see a lot of life-long Republicans and known Trump voters making claims like “I don’t really use social media” and “other than the weather I don’t keep up with the news”, both of which I know are lies in many cases.

    However, giving them benefit of the doubt on that, they’re admitting something equally as bad: They aren’t educating themselves, they aren’t informed on important matters, and facts do not matter to them. They’re shirking their responsibilities.

    Personally, I’ve always, always, always operated under the principle that our rights come with responsibilities, so I find it shameful that so many people are so negligent in that respect.

  • ImWaitingForRetcons@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Go vote, but it’s worth remembering that for the most part, the other party only does milquetoast critiques of the Nazis at best.

  • FE80@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    7 days ago

    One side has real Nazis

    And the other side seeks to compromise with them.

    • halfsalesman@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      7 days ago

      OK, we fucking know, so? We should let the Nazi’s win because the Democrats are spineless capitalists?

      • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        The point is that we can’t count on neo-liberals to do the right thing, they’re complicit in all this. So the Dems as a whole aren’t a party we can rely on until we primary them out.

        • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          7 days ago

          So the Dems as a whole aren’t a party we can rely on until we primary them out.

          Not happening before 26 or 28.

          So your solution?

          And please don’t say 3rd party. It’s obvious to anyone that pays attention that no 3rd party is viable and won’t be for a long, long time, if ever. No 3rd party has made themselves a household name. No 3rd party even has a SINGLE member in Congress. In the 2024 election the most popular 3rd party candidate only got 0.5% of the total votes cast.

          Not happening.

          So…

          • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            7 days ago

            There’s some primaries left for 2026 to vote in, work from there. The neo-liberal dems are bad but they’re not worm brained at least. Just hope they don’t put fucking Newsom up for 2028 otherwise it’ll be same as it ever was with him.

            • Optional@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              7 days ago

              Its going to happen. So, get your 3rd party together, or climb the DNC because y’all now have . . . . Less than three years to become political leaders.

        • halfsalesman@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          7 days ago

          That’s a shit fucking point. A better point: fascists won and they did not need to.

          Neo-liberals are not fascists. They’re greedy, nihilistic, empty husks. But they are not frothing at the mouth for killing gay’s and gassing brown people. Neo-liberals can actually be relied upon to be capitalistic and not give a shit about nationalism or “traditional values” and are generally easier to fight because they don’t operate a cult (or at least not like the fascists do).

          Some non-voter’s justification of “they’re both the same” is pants on head regarded.

                • halfsalesman@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  See, I need to know then how serious that perspective is because for me, blurring the lines between ideologies (even bad ones) is largely just an emotional manipulation tactic.

                  You call a neo-liberal a fascist and they’ll get really upset. You call a fascist a liberal of any kind… they’ll also get really upset. So if that’s the goal that makes sense. But then leftists will say it to other leftists like its actually true, particularly campists, auth-left, and marxist-leninists will do this and this just seems dumb to me. They are different threats and should be treated differently.

            • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              7 days ago

              This is the single dumbest meme I’ve ever seen in my life and you should be ashamed because I cannot be ashamed enough for the both of us that you posted this.

              Dial 911 and ask the operator to help you get back in school.

        • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          7 days ago

          Oh damn you right we should’ve voted for the magical third party that definitely would’ve won

          • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            7 days ago

            “Oh damn, we should continue to just suffer in this system and not demand better about it because can’t change it!” - That’s what you sound like right now.

            • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              7 days ago

              I’m in favor of changing the system but I’m not going to let the idea of a better system delude me into thinking that we’re in that improved system already. We absolutely should change the system, but when you look at the system we had at the time of the election, who else were people going to vote for if they didn’t want trump to win? We didn’t have ranked choice, we didn’t even get a primary for the Democrats.

              Blaming the Democrats for not winning is taking away the blame and attention away from the people everyone should be mad at, the Republicans. Dems fucked up, but that’s not holding Republicans accountable for what they are doing right now.

            • mghackerlady@leminal.space
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              7 days ago

              We should demand that it be better, but shooting ourselves in the foot while doing it is only going to give us a shot foot

              • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                We’re already shooting ourselves in the foot. The Dems, even when they had a trifecta in 2008, were still dropping the ball. They don’t elect effective people, just people who keep ensuring payments go up and not down.

            • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              Objectively wrong because there were third party candidates already on the ballot! How could you say they would’ve won when they already were running and lost?! “Oh they would’ve won if they were there” They were there! [These are they!](Third-party and independent candidates for the 2024 United States presidential election - Wikipedia https://share.google/xcOuOQvNZvwLprps9)

              • Matty Roses@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                I didn’t say they would’ve won, stop moving goal posts.

                I said they couldn’t have lost more than Kamala did. Because it was a binary thing on three counts?

                Did she win the Presidency? No.

                Did she keep the Senate? No.

                Did she win the House? No.

                No matter what you think of Claudia De La Cruz or Jill Stein, it’s just a simple fact neither one of them could have given a worse outcome than that one. And given the resources Kamala had, that’s particularly pathetic.

              • Matty Roses@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                7 days ago

                She was running for Presidency. And lost. Badly. As her party lost both houses.

                Pick any third party, they won just as much as Kamala did - and didn’t spend a billion and a half to do so.

                • Optional@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  What, so you and I are as successful at federal elections as any third party?

                  I mean - okay. But some idiots gave them $200 Million for that. We did it for free, apparently.

                  I’m saying they’re an unworkable idea at almost any price.

            • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              If by common logic voting is power, we need to organize and vote people into office that better represent us. Not just resign ourselves to this fate. I just don’t understand this desire to not put up any fight at all. It seems counter intuitive to survival.

              • halfsalesman@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                I just don’t understand this desire to not put up any fight at all. It seems counter intuitive to survival.

                Bitter and deep spite and resentment. Disgust. Self destructive stubborn catharsis in ruining people who you hate even if it destroys you as well.

                Just as the campists who actively live in “amerikkka” as I do for US citizen non-voters now.

                • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  I’ve voted in primaries for better candidates for the Dems since I could vote, for more progressive people so we have good representation. As much as I hate establishment Dems I’m not going to stop trying if for it. I’m disenfranchised by them more often than not and that makes me angry to want to do something, not be spiteful.

            • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              7 days ago

              Yeah, but you can’t primary the Dems thoroughly enough before 26 or 28.

              So the only VIABLE option in the near term to STOP FASCISM is voting Dem.

              But I’m sure a bunch of fools will still do the 3rd party thing come 28.

              Normally I’d be fine with them voting 3rd party in midterms, but in case anyone hasn’t noticed, things are getting pretty dark here. This is not the time to fuck around with a 3rd party, even for midterms.

              Vote 3rd party in local/state elections AFTER Americans stop getting executed in the street by masked federal goons. And don’t vote 3rd party for president until a 3rd party can actually win the presidency.

              • Matty Roses@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                Normally I’d be fine with them voting 3rd party

                Wake up babe, it’s the most important election f our lifetime again.

                Democratic apologists have literally been saying this for 26 years. Your strategy of Vote Blue No Matter Who is what brought you to this point.

                You want to just have the problems go away without any struggle. And it’s not gonna happen.

              • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                Its almost like democrats should have fixed the source of the spoiler effect by replacing First-past-the-post voting in states they control.

          • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            They could have won, people like you harassing others is part of the reason they didn’t. Go ahead and keep acting like the smartest guy in the room, you just look like a petulant child trying to force others to agree with you.

          • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            7 days ago

            Blaming the Democrats for what the Republicans are doing is like blaming the guy who opened the door for the serial killer to get into the house. Yeah, you shouldn’t have done that, yeah, you fucked up, yeah, you knew what would happen, but that’s not the same level of bad as the actual serial killer stabbing people. It’s even shifting blame away from the serial killer and holding the killer less accountable.

  • fodor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    If only the corporate Dems were actually on the good side… Sigh.

  • redwattlebird @lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 days ago

    The US political system is so, so very broken and honestly needs to be built up from scratch.

    Voting should be compulsory.

    Voting should be accessible.

    The bar for entry to run should be much lower and more accessible to people who want to run and make a change.

    Preferential voting should be considered.

    The people should have veto power over government if there is a vote of no confidence to allow a dissolution of said government and snap elections held to redistribute power in favour of the people.

    And so much more. Like getting rid of gerrymandering, electoral college etc. So that the votes actually reflect what the people want. If the country is mostly progressive, then it moves in a progressive direction.

    Etc. Etc.

  • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    The democratic system gave up on serving the disenfranchised long before the disenfranchised gave up on the democratic system.

    If you want to be angry, be angry at those protecting the system from change, not the people who have given up hope that it can be changed.

    Be kind to people, be ruthless to systems.