- 11 Posts
- 42 Comments
1·2 months agoWhoops you forgot to add that that was from an edit :3
it is not, this comment is for you and it is not edited
AND here’s the really fun part - That’s you highlighting comments! See how that is just part of the discussion? Neat how communication works, right?
I don’t understand
I don’t understand
waste of resources
I agree. However, those who don’t can respond as follows: waste of resources is better than terrorism
people are obviously scared
I agree. However, those who don’t can respond as follows: they shouldn’t be and I’m not scared.
Removed by mod
Among the meaningless comments made by people who are incapable of rational thinking, these few are actually meaningful and reasonable.
From @Ildsaye@hexbear.net
Surveillance gives terrorists like the US and its Zionist appendage a huge advantage, and the working class should not be surrendering its data to them without a fight.
However those comments can only prove Surveillance are unacceptable in America and Zionist related countries, Can anyone provide a counterpoint for other countries like Russia, China, India, Japan, South Korea…
Among the meaningless comments made by people who are incapable of rational thinking, these few are actually meaningful and reasonable.
From @Ildsaye@hexbear.net
Surveillance gives terrorists like the US and its Zionist appendage a huge advantage, and the working class should not be surrendering its data to them without a fight.
However those comments can only prove Surveillance are unacceptable in America and Zionist related countries, Can anyone provide a counterpoint for other countries like Russia, China, India, Japan, South Korea…
Public surveillance from government is what we are discussing, please do not mix it up with voyeurism
Why is that? Surveillance can still be helpful if all people are targeted.
Good for you, but I cannot afford to replicate your approach. Thank you for the responses
More surveillance = more crime detected, do I need to prove 1+1=2 for you as well?
FYI voice mail are surveilled
Your are lucky if your friends and parents don’t use facebook, but I’m not so lucky and I’m asking for help
If you are having trouble understanding, ask
People who use Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram are protected by the law, but they are also bound by the law at the same time. They do not materially benefit from government actions related to terrorism, and it is not in their interests to support them.
Many people accept surveillance because it does not seem to affect their daily lives, and not fully realize they are being deprived of their privacy.
Please help provide arguments against - surveillance does not significantly impact daily life and can be beneficial for national security.
Edited:
I agree. However, those who don’t can respond as follows: We do not have to choose between security and privacy, nor should we accept surveillance being used purely for profit. Instead, we can strengthen regulations and legal safeguards to ensure that surveillance is used responsibly and only for legitimate purposes.
Can you provide an argument for “Even with proper regulations, individuals’ emails and messages should not be accessible to governments.”
I will respond you with what @Alvaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone said
As the one making the argument, show me a study that supports that.
I agree. However, those who don’t can respond as follows: We do not have to choose between security and privacy, nor should we accept surveillance being used purely for profit. Instead, we can strengthen regulations and legal safeguards to ensure that surveillance is used responsibly and only for legitimate purposes.
When properly regulated and transparently managed, surveillance can enhance public safety without infringing on individual rights. Rather than opposing surveillance altogether, we should focus on creating clear laws, strong oversight, and accountability measures to prevent abuse and protect everyone’s interests.Can you provide an argument for “Even with proper regulations, individuals’ emails and messages should not be accessible to governments.”
I like your response.
Made a new account to badger me?
If you are looking for logical proof: More surveillance makes it more likely to detect a crime that is being planned, which increases protection.
agree, please prove the governments of Russia, China, India, Japan, South Korea are terrorists