Radical empathy is both radical and empathetic.

  • 0 Posts
  • 27 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 5th, 2023

help-circle
  • I’ll bite.

    As a math teacher I agree. Phrasing the question with “money” is ambiguous.

    That’s why the important part was showing your work which the student failed to do. Depending on school policy this may be a no-credit or at most half credit answer.

    The major flaw with math education is reading and writing. Very little of elementary school is spent reading, writing, and discussing. This problem is fantastic, it forces students to read, write and analyze. Especially since it’s ambiguous.

    If a student at that age said “Amy has more coins” and answered Amy prior I would take it.

    Alternatively they could go for the formal answer of “Bobby has 4 dimes. A dime is worth 10 pennies. Bobby has 40 pennies worth.”

    We forget that math is about reasoning and justification, not just calculation.



















  • Without spoiling too much from the book, the argument is “protection from the tyrrany of the massively misinformed.”

    The arguments hinge on the idea that, if voting is equal (I am not 100% sure on his stance for equitable), then the under informed masses force us into subjugation through their ignorance.

    Pragmatically, his major point is, it’s very hard (and likely impossible) for everyone to be informed on every topic, so we should abstain from topics where we are under informed (which for most of us, most of the time, is most topics).


  • I both think people have a right to dignity, which by extension means they should have a say of how to live their lives. I also think that the general population shouldn’t vote. Against Democracy is a really good read if you haven’t read it.

    For the record, I literally will drive people to the polls (since our current system creates better outcomes if more people vote) but I do really wish that most of them wouldn’t XD.