I like using modules so that I have a general basis to start with. It keeps me focused on the things relevant to the campaign.

But they are polished equally on each side, right?

Yeah, human brains are bad at statistics, so logical outcomes can still surprise us.

Statistically it comes up 5% of the time you use a hero point, so yeah, about as often as rolling a nat 20.

I habe no idea what this is, but it sounds incredibly whacky.

It also makes the Rhino a fairly competent celestial warrior.

Wait what?

Because a flying Rhino is a pretty absurd rules interaction.

From playing a Sci-Fi campaign once, I can confirm that this is true.

Option one sounds a lot cooler and more impressive, but option two sounds funnier.

“Should jail sentence time be based on race?” will allways be one of my favourite posts ever.

Thanks for pointing this out, that’s better than what I could’ve said to explain it. The DM can always make changes without adhering to any limitations, but if they are a good DM, they’ll at least try to be consistent. And that’s the least I expect from professional writers. (And I similarly expect them to wait for the actual rules of the system to be published before writing an adventure.)

I love this gem. The only thing they got a but wrong is that Bardic inspiration could actually be whispered, since it only requires the target to be able to hear you.

I feel you. I’m currently planning to run it someday and there are just so many things I’ll definetly change.

Glad someone else knows it. As a player who frequently had to transcribe spells into roll20, I always just assume other people know the components certain spells take to cast and then end up confused if they don’t.

Some do. I know I do. It limits what casters can do at least a little.

Because it would make subtle-spell kind of redundant and why even use components in the first place if they cannot be used to tell you are casting something?

Funnily enough, intellect devourers can actually mimic the target they are inhabiting quite convincingly, thanks to inheriting their memories. I once had an Alhoon in a campaign who made use of that fact. The players never found out, but its really terrifying to think about.

You are aware someone else already posted this several days prior? I know you’re uploading a lot of memes, but at least check whether something was already published here.

Out of couriosity: I have never played the game, so… is the game actually unplayable if you decide to be intolerant against one or more of these? (As in: Is the tolerance and representation part of the core mechanics or is this just meant as a statement?)