Sort of all depends on what is meant by a “reasonable” person.

Can I get this on a t-shirt?

Maybe we are running different software versions then because on my Model 3 I have it set to cruise control instead of FSD and it definitely lets me go above the speed limit. I have it set to default to speed limit when activated but with the right thumb wheel I can adjust set speed up or down. I’ve included a screenshot of my settings in case it’s helpful to anyone.

There is a setting in the menu where you can deactivate autopilot/FSD yourself and instead have a normal cruise control function.

I think about this kind of simplistically.

Firstly, answer to yourself is it practically possible to store and use vast amounts of data safely, without risk of being compromised?

If you say no, then we shouldn’t be doing this. If you said yes:

Since you think it is practically possible to do safely, the penalty for any company who fails to do this should be instant corporate death. Automatic nationalization and liquidation to compensate the victims. People who are found in court to be responsible should face severe consequences. Criminal negligence, multiple counts.

That’s the only way I see to get all of these data hoarding fucks to take it seriously.

/end pipe dream

Have you met their neighbors?

There is also this.

Tl;dw is that these data centers produce a ton of inaudible low frequency infrasound (think that feeling in your chest from a subwoofer) which can have health effects, especially with prolonged exposure.

Basically this guy recorded sound and infrasound and tested the neighborhoods around data centers vs. West Texas where all of the oil drilling and fracking activity is vs. normal places. The data centers were producing massive amounts of infrasound 24/7 and neighbors were really pissed. Multiple reports of health concerns from it. It was more than the areas of drilling and fracking in TX.

One of my favorite moments of the video is when he is at someone’s home near the data center and discussing the situation and he lays the camera down on the floor and the video feed begins to visibly vibrate.

Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?

Here’s another shirt design I’d wear.

It’s not breaking news but it is a really interesting snapshot in time showing how not only were these behaviors occurring, it was at times very publicly normalized. Comparing a 13 year old actress to a “nascent whore” is staggering.

I believe you it just sounds like something made up by a Hollywood screenwriter. We need unobtanium to house the time crystal.

Time crystal? Come on. Really.

This sooo much. I’m not a tech person but I’m trying to learn because the giant corporations are clearly evil. I just want to have a modicum of privacy in my corner of the world so here I am trying to figure out how to self host some basic services.

This seemed a little sus to me so I checked the dictionary. Merriam-Webster says wet can mean consisting of liquid such as water. (See 1a of screen capture).

The second amendment of the U.S. constitution guarantees the rights of citizens to bear arms. Many liberals support stricter gun laws so that there are stronger background checks, limits, etc in order to try and reduce mass shootings, etc. The right wing folks are generally the opposite, trying to remove limits and make them accessible.

So no, you cannot evoke the second amendment as a defense for shooting anyone. It would only be a potential legal defense against laws limiting gun ownership. The second amendment says you can own a gun, not that you can shoot people with them.

As for the state’s monopoly on violence, that pretty much stands except in clear cut cases of self defense. So if someone were to shoot an ICE agent (and survive the situation to make it to trial), it would have to be some pretty extraordinary circumstances that would allow the person to avoid conviction of a crime.