And then her predecessor became best friends with Dick Cheney.

It was probably the FBI that planned the whole thing, gave the guy the weapon, and goaded him into doing it just like they’ve been doing for decades so they can run to the news and talk about how they “foiled a terrorist plot.”

Yeah criticizing the opposition party for refusing to oppose anything done by the ruling party definitely has all the marks of a psyop campaign by a foreign state.

Its just like the TSA precheck and now the third party companies like Clear offering to skip/use minimally invasive security screenings for a small fee.

That seems like a feature not a bug. I don’thave an issue with tearing literally everything down that’s tied to him.

Im also from the US, but I can see all the parallels to the UK government. Both have been pretty aligned with one another for decades now.

IANAL but AFAIK without PC, they can only pat down his person (for officer safety) similar to what TSA does at the airport, but not reach into his pockets or backpack as that’s considered a search. It’s a subtle but important difference.

Meanwhile our president bragged on the campaign trail that he could stand in the middle of a NYC street and shoot someone and not lose any voters. We have federal agents brutally slaying innocent people on streets across the country while being treated like heroes.

Its really funny to see EVs coming on the scene with insane 0-60 times and horsepower numbers only for chuds to now claim that those things don’t matter.

Well you seem to think you know enough to state that it was definitely the tool and not the teen and that your interpretation would be the more descriptive and accurate headline.

So you’re saying everyone else who used the same tool got identical results to his plan?

We know what they want in Venezuela too. It’s their oil reserves.

Great sentiment but we all know a business will get a pass for this just like when Meta got busted torrenting all those books and were told its okay because they’re using it to train their AI.

I’m sure that most NYC workers have seen a $100k raise over the last 9 years so this all seems above board.

Fair enough but has anyone actually audited how secure Jellyfin is when exposed directly to the open internet? Not even the actual developers of the software recommend that, yet the majority of the replies here are being overly smug and cocky thinking it’s perfectly safe to do so.

Oh they’re “mystery chemicals” now? I thought you posted a study referencing a specific chemical.

This exactly highlights my previous point about conflating cigarettes with vaping. Now youre arguing “we dont even know what’s in them so they’re definitely harmful because look at how harmful this completely separate product is!” We’re supposed to just take your argument on faith despite your inability to even use the proper terminology all because this other inhaled product with completely separate chemicals and chemical reactions is bad for you.

What’s hilarious is that this started with Win10 so its been an issue for over a decade now and two major revisions at least (possibly started on Win8).

Obvious troll account.

Note that opening a port gives full access to that port to the next higher Network. Opening a port directly to the Internet is therefore insecure and not recommended.

It says so right there.

There are multiple ways of exposing Jellyfin to the outside - the most common ones are:

forwarding its Ports directly to the internet (not recommended!)

forwarding through a Reverse Proxy

using a VPN connection to enter the Network

use a VPS to Reverse Proxy to your home network

And there.

This smug mentality that security is unnecessary when exposing ports to the open internet reminds me of people who think its fine to drive drunk because “I’ve done it dozens of times before and nothing happened!” It’s quite absurd to read.

This seems like a naive viewpoint as you’re exposing your whole network and everything connected to it to the open internet. Just because the port connects to Jellyfin doesnt mean there isn’t some exploit or vulnerability that can allow for greater access. This is media software written by volunteers and offered for free, so I wouldn’t expect Fort Knox security from it just because its FOSS. In fact, they specifically put the onus on the user to do this themselves if they so chose.