• mctoasterson@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Here’s an idea. How about we abandon ragebait shortform slop/garbage aggregators entirely, and stop rewarding them with excessive device permissions and personal data.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      How about we abandon ragebait shortform slop/garbage aggregators entirely

      In my day, we listened to AM Talk Radio! 16 hours a day, to and from work! None of this prissy little short form phone slop, no sir. It was three hour long shifts of Rush Limbaugh, Don Imus, Doug “The Greaseman” Tracht, and Sean Hannity. I earned my hate honestly, by fiddling with a little dial on my walkman and getting five commercials about cigars and dick pills every eight minutes. I got to hear bad riff tracks about how Japan was taking over our economy produced on a AKAI S900 that had been dropped down a flight of stairs. I didn’t know these people even had faces until Limbaugh showed up as a talking head for the NFL for a few months.

      The very fucking idea that these stupid petulant spoiled woke lib fuck-around find-out kids are getting their news from a five minute long vertical visual display? OOOOOOOOoh it makes me SO MAD! I hate 'dem kids. I hate’m!!!

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Literally anything but FOSS, huh?

    Out of the frying pan and into a cold frying pan.

      • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It unironically is, and it’s not entirely the fault of the users either. The average person doesn’t know what FOSS means, what instances are, or what a federated service is and many platforms do a poor job of explaining what those things are and why they are superior.

        Additionally, people need to understand that FOSS is not a selling point to the average user and that throwing that term around will go in one ear and out the other. As far as they are concerned their apps are already free because they don’t have to pay a transactional monetary value for them and “open source” is beyond meaningless to them and they couldn’t care less.

  • FukOui@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Oh come on. Another centralised social media service that could be compromised. Wtf is wrong with these people

    • Pika@rekabu.ru
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      They follow what is advertised. Fediverse, by its nature, doesn’t have money for this. There was a push for Mastodon, though.

      • Postimo@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        When you say there was a push, do you mean there was a time when they did have ads, or do you mean the community push with the twitter troubles?

        • Pika@rekabu.ru
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          The community push, mainly. But there seemed to be a PR campaign to capitalize on it. I don’t know if there were official adverts.

          • Postimo@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Ah okay, that was my understanding as well. I was curious if anyone had tried making an ad.

    • E_coli42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      99% don’t know what the Fediverse is. I can’t blame them for jumping ship to Upscrolled since it’s what they have heard of.

      • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        And me, living in the dark woods of Lemmy and Mastodon, have never, until now, heard of this ‘upscrolled’. I really like my ignorance-laced way of life.

    • Broken@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t really fault them when they don’t know there is an alternative. And the alternative isn’t clear cut and/or very good.

      I do fault them for when they think that the platform is the solution and don’t expect the same thing to happen.

    • quips@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Is there a federated/decentralized version of tiktok? Right now would be the perfect time to implement one of these.

      • Pika@rekabu.ru
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Loops.

        However, of a dozen instances that exist, only the main one - loops.video - functions well and serves a diversity of content. It’s still in heavy development, but technically, ActivityPub is already included.

          • FG_3479@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            You probably used a VPN or privacy browser. Social media platforms are terrified of bots and will punish a poor Recaptcha V3 or similar score without telling you.

            • Electricd@lemmybefree.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              VPN + adblocker + resist fingerprinting + mail alias (Addy) indeed

              They have cloudflare captcha which I passed, so they’re being annoying

              Update: unbanned after contacting their support by mail. No questions asked

    • FirmDistribution@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think it’s hard to host a video-focused social media on the fediverse, I imagine it would have a high cost to maintain.

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Build it on top of Bittorrent. If you like a post, you’re seeding it. When you want to stop seeding it, your like goes away.

        Then popular things will have a large pool of seeds mitigating much of the bandwidth cost to the instance host.

        With the side effect of making manipulating the voting algorithm with bots a lot more expensive.

        • Postimo@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I think people would be pretty quickly upset by the batter and storage drain from this. I have to imagine if picking an instance is a barrier to mastodon, most folks are not interested enough to learn the mechanics of why likes suddenly use system resources, and see it as a failing of the app.

          • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I don’t see any other choices other than:

            1. You host it yourself. (Peer to Peer social media)
            2. You pay someone else to host it for you. (Instanced social media)
            3. You trade your digital freedom, privacy and political stability of your country to someone else to host it for you. (Meta, X, TikTok)

            3 hasn’t been working out so far and people really don’t want to have to pay another subscription. So you can spend your battery life and data instead. Maybe setup the service so that other people can seed on your behalf, so you could use your own resources or pay for someone elses all in the same ecosystem.

            Peertube does a similar thing, using bittorrent to share the load, but it only works while you’re actively watching the video so outside of very popular videos it is usually just the instance who is providing bandwidth. By tying the data sharing directly into the primary interaction method it creates a much larger pool of peers and, eventually, once everyone stops seeding it the data stops existing.

            No permanent record of everything you’ve ever posted, no central repository of data to be hoovered up by the AI startup who pays off the instance owner, no empowering a single person to control all of social media for their own selfish ends.

          • Chronographs@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Plus the network usage for people with data caps, ISPs who throttle you for any p2p traffic etc it’d be a mess. Not to mention torrents usually have a ‘ramp up’ time as they find and connect to peers, probably not what people used to and endless stream of autoplaying short-form videos would want.

  • merdaverse@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    I tried it for an hour or so and it’s absolutely filled with Nazis. One of them was criticizing Elon Musk and Trump for not being nazi enough. No thanks.

  • DeltronZero@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    I looked it up in the App store out of curiosity and holy crap that app almost as bad as TikTok for privacy. Though I suppose people jumping ship from TikTok aren’t too concerned about data privacy or else they wouldn’t have been using TikTok in the first place.

  • midas22@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Why would anyone use TikTok or any clone like that to begin with? Do they want their brain to rot?

      • tetris11@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        See, White Rectangle, you swipe like this: “oh. oh quite. oh dear. oh no. aw. and how.”
        But with Black Rectangle, you swipe like: “yo, hol’ da commentz, Imma bounce your pinky up in this!”

        this comment was brought to you by the nineties.

        • Lightfire228@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Oh i know

          I’m more blaming the system than the user. The system is designed to be as addicting as possible. Literally a century of addiction research into drugs and gambling, all used to squeeze every drop of engagement from the user

        • Vupware@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          To a point. At least we’re reading and using our brains more on these text-based sites!

  • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    How many quick short videos can one consume before they become tired of them? What is the bizarre appeal to that crap instead of actually doing something?

    Yes I am typing here on Lemmy, you could make an argument, but damn you see ten short videos you have seen them all.

    • unphazed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      For me it’s news snippets, recipe ideas, 3d print ideas, and short form comedy. I look at it maybe 15min daily. Sometimes days without. My wife probably does 2hrs a day (stay home mother, homeschool teacher, honored caregiver). For her it’s the entertainment that can be quickly put down, little investment involved.

      • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I can’t imagine. I can get all of that elsewhere, video is such a slow delivery…

        There is something just wrong with quick cuts and fast in your face stuff. I swear it’s a simple dumbing down plus dopamine injection. It can’t be good for you.

  • chronix@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Best app yet, but eventually that app is gonna get bought out just like TikTok and eventually it will get censored.

  • Noah Snedden@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    41k new users in 4 days? Not too bad, but certainly not a mass exodus. Tiktok’s user base is quite large, although I don’t know the US specific user base size. It is a shame people don’t choose better alternatives though.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Tiktok’s user base is quite large

      875 million to over 950 million daily active users (DAU) globally as of Jan 2026.

      It is a shame people don’t choose better alternatives though.

      TikTok was the better alternative. That’s half the joke. As soon as it caught on, the plutocrats stepped in and seized control

      Not unlike how Facebook bought out and gutted Instagram or JP Morgan took over Reddit and cleaned out all the lefties before taking it public.

      That’s before you get into the marketing budget that social media needs to build the kind of massive userbase you’re asking for.

  • Null User Object@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Its website says the platform will remain “impartial” to political agendas, won’t shadowban users or content, and will “uphold social responsibility.”

    I don’t feel, in this day and age, like you can be politically impartial (i.e. allow fascists to use your platform to spread propaganda) while simultaneously upholding social responsibility (i.e. not allow fascists to use your platform to spread propaganda).

    • Hozerkiller@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      You can be arguably impartial. Youre not banning them for being Nazis you’re banning them for all the stuff Nazis do like the racism. I would also argue you shouldn’t be politically impartial and just ban Nazis because Nazis should not feel welcomed.

    • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you look into the founder, you’ll quickly realize that he’s very much biased and has a lot of agendas to push, and I have no doubt in mind that this is reflected in his platform.

    • E_coli42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Isn’t upscrolled created by a Palestinian? I doubt he’d be okay with censoring a genocide against his people.