Please don’t stop on children, no one want their clothes being stripped off without their knowledge and consent, digitally or physically.
Fair, but straight males will generally look at the undressed bodies of grown women and enjoy it.
The general consensus among the same group when it comes to literal children though? Nobody really wants to see that. People who do stand out, and they are very strange to the rest of us, to the point of revulsion, anger, and malevolence. Like if it’s your child, or a child under your care, and you’re changing a diaper, or bathing a small child, it’s one thing, but for someone posting pictures of random children unclothed, that bothers most people. People who are not paedophiles have a drive to protect our young. It’s part of being a mammal; in general, mammals protect the young of the species.
But, absolutely. One thing I will say for AI generated porn (that is not CSAM) is, it can’t not consent. No human person’s propriety is being violated. You could say it encourages people to seek the real thing, but you can say that for all pornography. There is a counter-argument that virtual girls can be made to do things most real women wouldn’t do, but then again, there are enough who would for the right amount of money. Using AI or virtual girls, something like SFM (Source Film Maker, it’s a Valve-produced tool that lets you make movies using video game characters), no real person has to do those things if the AI, virtual girl, or SFM model is lifelike enough.
At this point, why would anyone want to be related to this Nazi pedophile child?
Seriously, if you buy a Tesla right now you deserve it be torched. You work for Tesla or SpaceX, and it’s on you, you deserve to be ridiculed and lose your friends
At this point, of you work for this shit, do business with this shit, or buy from this shit, as far as I’m concerned you are a pedophile nazi as well
Man, when I read this, I didn’t believe it. So I did a search and yup, this story is in EVERY major news site.
Funny thing though. The article said 97% oppose this. Yet, when it became possible there was an image generated every minute, I guess by the 3%.
The dissenters can be recognised by their fedoras, goatees and fondness for the phrase “well, actually it’s ephebophilia”
I seriously don’t understand why the entire world isn’t boycotting anything he touches. He’s a Nazi and a danger to the world
Sunk cost fallacy for everyone that isn’t also a Nazi, when you’re heavily invested in tech stocks it seemingly makes it easier to dismiss the evil.
Because he’s really popular with other nazis who are also dangers to the world.
Have you considered he represents a massive investment by the US government and that he’s such a massive security risk that a handfull of countries killing or capturing him could possibly cause endless headaches for the US security state.
Edit: to be clear this is not suggesting anyone murder musk (he obv needs to go to jail for lying to get contracts and manipulating stocks) but rather than the US department of defense has made a socially stunted narcissist a key point of failure in a lot of critical projects (starlink, NASA, etc)
But also cause some really sick parties in the streets
I’m saying they should boycott everything he touches not capture and kill him
How do you boycott a guy who gets like 90% of his money from governments?
Tesla is essentially a derivative so it might crash eventually but we’re already seeing his state backed companies like starlink buy up tesla products he can’t sell.
Nearly universal, except for anybody with any power.
It’s almost like the people in charge are irredeemable.
“nearly”
Well the Epstien island visitors love the new feature on their favourite app!
Why even have a poll like someone needed to check if people have a problem with this
up next a poll on whether or not cancer is bad
