I dont think people are discussing AI enough, and the extreme dependence on a two or three mega-companies for software AND for hardware?

  • Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    I mean, I dunno about your circles but from my end it’s been a constant topic of discussion ad nauseam.

    • MichaelHenrikWynn@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Even if AI is an enabling technology that solves many problems, it is also a potentially a horrific totalitarian tool. And the consumers must be protected. By this I mean, they must not be allowed to centralize too much and regional and local services established. And the consumers must have an offline PC, in which some services work detached from this thing. They can still use the services on some other PC. The purpose is to protect spaces for being human, centralization that i heard bezos wish for is the absolute worst scenario.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Make sure you are checking the all feed, because most of the anti-AI discussion happens on !fuck_ai@lemmy.world (then scroll past the first 4 pinned posts). It does spill to various technology communities as well. Locally only on our !pcgaming@lemmy.ca does AI become relevant.

    • MichaelHenrikWynn@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I can tell you that I am not entirely happy about AI myself. But we cannot “un-invent” it? So we must deal with it, unfortunately.

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        We can uninvent it. At least on the scale it’s currently being pushed. You just need regulations on the environmental impact. It completely undermines the technology.