Let’s travel back to when memes were new, anyone could get their 15 minutes with a silly dance, and the amount of data tech companies collected about you was slightly less creepy. Mozilla reunited some of the biggest names in late ‘aughts memedom for its “come back to Firefox” campaign. [Media: https://youtu.be/E2AoYIKwJqM]
  • artyom@piefed.socialEnglish
    1·
    4 hours ago

    Wether an adblock is native or an extension does nothing to circumvent the native limitations of V3 that exists on all chromium browsers

    As I’ve already stated several times, that’s simply not true. MV3 literally only applies to extensions. But thanks for dumbing it down for me.

    I can believe that the features that work on V3 encompass your personal needs

    This has nothing to do with my “personal needs”, this is a technical discussion.

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      1·
      2 hours ago

      Apparently you’re right that MV3 only restricts extensions, not native blockers. I stand corrected on that part.

      However, uBO on MV2 still has features that no known native ad blocker on a Chromium-based browser offers.

      The closest match I could find is Brave Shields, but it still lags behind on per-site control, mainly because it has no dynamic filtering matrix, and it has no logger comparable to uBO’s. That most of the list i already mentioned multiple times.

      To date, nothing matches or beats Firefox + uBO, so the original point still stands. The burden of proof that shows the contrary is on you for that.