SuspciousCarrot78@lemmy.world to Privacy@lemmy.ml · edit-22 months agoI made my LLM stop bullshitting. Nothing leaves your machine.codeberg.orgexternal-linkmessage-square46linkfedilinkarrow-up1111arrow-down116file-textcross-posted to: localllama@sh.itjust.workspractical_ai@crazypeople.onlineauai@programming.devprivacy@programming.devprivacy@lemmy.ml
arrow-up195arrow-down1external-linkI made my LLM stop bullshitting. Nothing leaves your machine.codeberg.orgSuspciousCarrot78@lemmy.world to Privacy@lemmy.ml · edit-22 months agomessage-square46linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: localllama@sh.itjust.workspractical_ai@crazypeople.onlineauai@programming.devprivacy@programming.devprivacy@lemmy.ml
minus-squareseadoo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down1·3 months agoI think interesting? It’s kind of hard to tell. You are going to have to significantly tone down the editorialization and platitudes to get this to a place where a journal might consider it. Make the point of how it’s novel or useful by explaining what it does, not by repeating that it’s novel and useful.
minus-squareSuspciousCarrot78@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down2·edit-22 months ago[deleted by user]
minus-squareglarf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·3 months agoThe description has such an unsettling, overconfident, llm-style tone for a project described as something to challenge LLM hallucinations.
minus-squareSuspciousCarrot78@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·edit-22 months ago[deleted by user]
minus-squareglarf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down4·3 months agoGood for you, welcome to the internet where people’s opinions abound. I didn’t accuse you of writing it with an LLM I said it was an LLM style, if you don’t like my opinion, that’s fine with me. I simply found the writing style unsettling. Cheers!
minus-squareDearth@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·edit-23 months agoLLMs were created by reading millions of *social media posts written by neurodivergent people sharing their passions online. *edit: spelling
I think interesting? It’s kind of hard to tell.
You are going to have to significantly tone down the editorialization and platitudes to get this to a place where a journal might consider it.
Make the point of how it’s novel or useful by explaining what it does, not by repeating that it’s novel and useful.
[deleted by user]
The description has such an unsettling, overconfident, llm-style tone for a project described as something to challenge LLM hallucinations.
[deleted by user]
Good for you, welcome to the internet where people’s opinions abound. I didn’t accuse you of writing it with an LLM I said it was an LLM style, if you don’t like my opinion, that’s fine with me. I simply found the writing style unsettling. Cheers!
[deleted by user]
LLMs were created by reading millions of *social media posts written by neurodivergent people sharing their passions online.
*edit: spelling
[deleted by user]