• Doom@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    Guys c’mon

    There are microphones in YOUR POCKET. They track your location and likely have access to all your communications literally in person and online. We’re going after remotes though? Okay. Sure. Whatever.

    • SirLeToet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      Nobody here saw anything of Apple’s keynote a few days ago.

      Several times my privacy-WTF sense went tingling off the radar. Those devices are the absolute pinnacle of privacy invasion.

    • pankuleczkapl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Have you considered the possibility that many of the people you are talking to have things like degoogled phones with custom ROMs, while the remote is running a closed-source firmware that most definitely is spying on you all the time?

      • Doom@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        If you think degoogling your phone is going to make it not spy on you, then it makes sense you would target your remote.

        • pankuleczkapl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          25 days ago

          It definitely makes it a lot less likely, since you need to have hardware exploits (or some Android zero-days), which are rare, valuable, non-trivial to exploit, and only accessible to a very limited group of actors (CIA, very proficient hacker groups), so these will not be wasted on just stealing your data…

    • Rothe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      Bizarre take. Most of us are perfectly capable of being aware of more than one issue at a time. One doesn’t cancel out the other.

      • Doom@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        It isn’t different issues though. It is the same issue. But removing the microphone from your TV remote is literally nothing if you live in a world with cellphones or have a cellphone or even just use the internet. Your router can see your house these days.

        It’s goofy.

        • newline@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          This defeatist mentality is exactly what those spying want you to think. Why bother trying to be more private at all right? Might as well give up entirely

          • Doom@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            25 days ago

            It’s literally not defeatist. I’m saying there is an army coming and you are painting your nails to get ready for war.

            It might look cool, might even help you have confidence to fight better. But it’s worthless entirely especially if you live in a house or go to a workplace with people that have phones, own one yourself, have a wifi network or your neighbor has wifi.

    • Janx@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      That’s whataboutism. The simple fact is, the vast majority of people don’t want or need microphone capabilities in their tv/remote (unlike a smartphone). But it’s there and can be exploited. Add in the fact that TVs are opaque privacy nightmares. Do most people know what they’re doing at any given moment? Not a chance.

      • Doom@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        25 days ago

        It can’t be a whataboutism. It’s the same topic. I might’ve not made it clear but if you live in a house with wifi, your neighbor has wifi, your family or coworkers own phones, you go out in public really at all. This isn’t going to be the one that’s gonna move any needle, it is at best a feel good thing to do.