• TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yeah, some of the stuff that has been able to be confirmed via geological studies is just insane. It’s crazy to me how they aren’t more widely known for disrupting the idea of prehistory.

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Blame the people who don’t look like them but run the country. Anglo fragility won’t give brown people have a chance.

    • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I wouldn’t say the idea of prehistory is disrupted per se. But we have to accept that it’s region-dependent. In any given region (recorded) history started when the oldest still available account was preserved.

      Some regions are far better at preserving very old accounts than others.

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s not how we classically define prehistory though. Technically pre-history is defined as the period of time beginning when the first humans started using stone tools and ending when different cultures developed writing systems.

        My criticism is that western scholars put too much importance on the written word.

        • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          That’s my point: The classical definition makes the assumption that written records are the only records with any kind of reliability, which doesn’t hold everywhere.

          I could’ve phrased it better.