bots on websites, on apps on forums, has anyone found a real solution to getting rid of bots? and bot accounts? if so id love to know any solutions

  • who@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    23 hours ago
    • anonymous
    • available to everyone
    • free of (unwanted) bots

    Pick two.

    • hirihit640@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Arguably you could use some digital ID like the EU, that identifies you as a human but not which human, using fancy cryptography. With worldwide rollout this would give you all 3

      • who@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        If anonymous and available to everyone, what would prevent people from acquiring an ID and passing it on to a bot, or from acquiring multiples?

        • hirihit640@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          The government would keep track of whether or not they issued you an ID, so that you can’t acquire multiple. You’ll probably be responsible for not losing it, or maybe there’s ways to revoke lost ones without compromising the privacy of it.

          As for humans passing their token to a bot, that’s not really solvable by any system. There is always a possibility that a human is just talking to a bot and then typing out the post themselves. But the human is still the one with the authority, and chooses to delegate to the bot.

          • who@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            As for humans passing their token to a bot, that’s not really solvable by any system.

            Indeed. Which is (part of) why I wrote, “pick two”.

            But the human is still the one with the authority, and chooses to delegate to the bot.

            Which is what we already have today.

        • aivoton@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Rate-limiting ID acquiring and having them to be short-lived deals with malicious parties. Having for example a token that proofs that you’re a legitimate person for 1 day, but your identity is tied to it for the duration means that you can only abuse the system only so for so long. For longer periods e.g. a month, half a year, you can provide pseudoanonymity, and it poses bigger issues with privacy, but a person who is willing to be subjected to be identified for a certain period of time gains certain privileges.

          Sounds very dystopian though, but not having ID won’t stop the tech giants from profiling you anyways.

          • who@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            but your identity is tied to it for the duration

            This doesn’t disprove what I wrote, as it’s not anonymous.

            you can provide pseudoanonymity,

            Pseudoanonymity is not anonymity, regardless of how any given person chooses to define that nebulous term.

            My “pick two” stands.

          • who@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            14 hours ago

            but your identity is tied to it for the duration

            Then it’s not anonymous.