• yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Same here. I looked it up and apparently Brazil mandates voting even if you don’t live in the country.

    If you don’t vote they can refuse to grant or extend your passport:

    In Brazil, people who fail to vote in an election are barred from obtaining a passport and subject to other restrictions until settling their situation before an electoral court or after they have voted in the two most recent elections.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compulsory_voting

    So polling places are a necessity in places with large numbers of Brazilians.

    • Dagnet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You have to vote but you can also justify your absence or just pay the extremely cheap fine, which is more of a hassle than voting but not always

    • treadful@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Didn’t know they had compulsory voting. Interesting idea.

      So polling places are a necessity in places with large numbers of Brazilians.

      Not a necessity. I doubt all Brazillians in the US are traveling to those dozen or so cities they have polling places in.

      Mail in voting is all I’ve ever heard of for overseas voting, though I pretty much only know about how the US runs elections.

      • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Well, I’d assume the polling places are in locations with many Brazilians around.

        As far as I know many countries allow citizens to vote in person in their embassies. International mail can take ages to arrive and if you want your vote have high odds of being counted having embassies send a bag of votes through their priority diplomatic mail is the safest bet.

        With the US being quite big and hosting a large Brazilian diaspora, it makes sense to have a couple polling stations in major hubs. It looks like the polling places are in cities with Brazilian consulates anyway.

        But with 2,000,000 Brazilians in the US, the consulates probably don’t have the capacity to host the vote. It’s probably just a minority voting in-person anyway but still.

        • treadful@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I’m not arguing against it. I understand why they would do it. The idea is just surprising to me and I’m surprised the article only passed over it like it was common knowledge.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I also find it surprising and interesting that Brazil would go to the trouble of setting up in-person voting locations for people outside Brazil instead of just relying on the mail.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Oh yeah because forcing people to vote has definitely prevented shitheads from becoming president /s