negativenull@piefed.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agoCorrelation == Causation?media.piefed.worldimagemessage-square50linkfedilinkarrow-up1682arrow-down18
arrow-up1674arrow-down1imageCorrelation == Causation?media.piefed.worldnegativenull@piefed.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square50linkfedilink
minus-squareDookieman12@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20arrow-down1·2 days agoCorrelation doesn’t necessarily mean causation, but every instance of causation is accompanied by at least one correlation. Disregarding correlation entirely is equally fallacious.
minus-squareMalgas@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·1 day agoCorrelation doesn’t imply causation, but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing ‘look over there’.
minus-squarered_tomato@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 day agoAny causation is accompanied by someone reminding everyone that correlation doesn’t imply causation.
minus-squaremarcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 day agoOh, not every. But the correlation is really high for some reason.
minus-squaretrem@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·1 day agoI mean, you do still need to subtract this:
minus-squareFiskFisk33@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·18 hours agoyes, but the above is clearly more than that
Correlation doesn’t necessarily mean causation, but every instance of causation is accompanied by at least one correlation.
Disregarding correlation entirely is equally fallacious.
Correlation doesn’t imply causation, but it does waggle its eyebrows suggestively and gesture furtively while mouthing ‘look over there’.
Any causation is accompanied by someone reminding everyone that correlation doesn’t imply causation.
Oh, not every. But the correlation is really high for some reason.
I mean, you do still need to subtract this:
yes, but the above is clearly more than that