• RoundSparrow@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    2 comments is hardly a fixation.

    You are not talking about the subjects, you are talking about me: Stephen Alfred Gutknecht. Fixated on the messenger. www.GutknechtAutism.org website if you want to better understand me. Which is not this Lemmy posting about Las Vegas, Nevada economics.

    I am very curious what lead to such a style.

    “Hyperlexia is a syndrome characterized by a child’s precocious ability to read. It was initially identified by Norman E. Silberberg and Margaret C. Silberberg (1967), who defined it as the precocious ability to read words without prior training in learning to read, typically before the age of five. They indicated that children with hyperlexia have a significantly higher word-decoding ability than their reading comprehension levels.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperlexia

    … "They indicated that children with hyperlexia have a significantly higher word-decoding ability than their reading comprehension levels.” … https://www.finnegansweb.com/wiki/index.php/Page_581 James Joyce, Finnegans Wake… You Too can learn to be Word (John 1:1) Woke, Metaphor Woke. Study Finnegans Wake by James Joyce. “Finnegans Wake is the greatest guidebook to media study ever fashioned by man.” - Marshall McLuhan, Newsweek Magazine, p.56, February 28, 1966 - it can happen to you!

    • yunqihao [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      You are not talking about the subjects, you are talking about me

      That is fair but it is possible to talk about things without a fixation. You simply type in an extremely unique and interesting manner. I am no more fixated on you than I am on an interesting shaped cloud.

      Hyperlexia

      Very interesting I had not heard of this before. So you have hyperlexia, and this leads you to typing in many tangents?

      • RoundSparrow@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        So you have hyperlexia, and this leads you to typing in many tangents?

        Have you read Finnegans Wake published May 4, 1939? You think it’s tangents… I view that is anti-WWW anti-diverse. How many languages can you read?

        this leads you to typing in many tangents?

        James Joyce cracked all languages and gestures, body languages, etc. Where you think I am ignorantly changing topics, I am surfing all human languages at levels you are not “Woke” to, the title of the book is “Woke”, Finnegans Wake.

        I did mention Finnegans Wake to you in the message you are replying to, right? did you just toss that away and ignore it?

         

        • yunqihao [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Have you read FInnegans Wake published May 4, 1939?

          No

          How many languages can you read?

          Difficult to say depends on what counts as a dialect and a language and also how fluently I should be able to read for it to count but at its strictest 4 and at its loosest 9.

          did mention Finnegans Wake to you in the message you are replying to, right?

          Not to me no. It was mentioned in the original comment I replied to however I was far more interested in your style of writing than the specific argument you were engaging in with said comment.

          • RoundSparrow@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Not to me no.

            Ahh, so you jump in with blindness to context.

            Very common issue these days with Apple iPhone / Apple iPad / Android devices / computers.

             

            “Context Blindness: Technology and the Next Stage of Human Evolution (Understanding Media Ecology, 10)”
            by Eva Berger
            “Are people with autism giving us a glimpse into our future human condition? Could we be driving our own evolution with our technology and, in fact, be witnessing the beginning of the next stage of human evolution? The thesis at the center of this book is that since we have delegated the ability to read context to contextual technologies such as social media, location, and sensors, we have become context blind. Since context blindness―or caetextia in Latin―is one of the most dominant symptoms of autistic behavior at the highest levels of the spectrum, people with autism may indeed be giving us a peek into our human condition soon. We could be witnessing the beginning of the next stage of human evolution―Homo caetextus.”

             

            “Eva Berger is a senior lecturer at the School of Media Studies of the College of Management Academic Studies (COLMAN), where she also served as Dean (2006-2012). She holds a B.A. from the Department of Film and Television at Tel-Aviv University (1985) and an M.A. (1986) and a Ph.D (1991) in Media Ecology from New York University. Dr. Berger has taught at NYU, Tel Aviv University, the Kibbutzim College of Education and the Sam Spiegel Film School, and has been part of the faculty at COLMAN for close to 30 years. She has served on numerous boards and public service organizations including the Israel Peace Initiative, Israel Press Council, and Institute of General Semantics.”

             

            Anyway. Finnegans Wake by James Joyce can really help you develop self-awareness of Lemmy technology media systems usage. Repeating: “Finnegans Wake is the greatest guidebook to media study ever fashioned by man.” - Marshall McLuhan, Newsweek Magazine, p.56, February 28, 1966

            • yunqihao [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Ahh, so you jump in with blindness to context.

              No I was aware of it, it simply wasn’t relevant to my interest which is your unique manner of communication not your thoughts on economics.

              • RoundSparrow@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                No I was aware of it, it simply wasn’t relevant to my interest

                You thought my direct linking of Finnegans Wake was not relevant to me and communicating with me. “Your interests” reek of harassment and active measures against these topics and how they relate to Twitter owner Elon Musk, Donald Trump Truth Social, and Rupert Murdoch Fox News. Anti-literacy badgering. Anti-woke, Anti Finnegans Woke. MAGA values messaging.

                 

                • “In Donald Trump, we have a frightening Venn diagram consisting of three circles: the first is extreme present hedonism; the second, narcissism; and the third, bullying behavior. These three circles overlap in the middle to create an impulsive, immature, incompetent person who, when in the position of ultimate power, easily slides into the role of tyrant, complete with family members sitting at his proverbial “ruling table.” Like a fledgling dictator, he plants psychological seeds of treachery in sections of our population that reinforce already negative attitudes.” ― Bandy X Lee, The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump: 27 Psychiatrists and Mental Health Experts Assess a President. October 3, 2017. Page 44.
                • yunqihao [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  I had no intention of harassing you. I simply took an interest in your extremely unique means of communication. I will disengage here as I seem to be causing you distress.

                  • RoundSparrow@midwest.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    I simply took an interest in your extremely unique means of communication.

                    I keep mentioning:

                    1. James Joyce

                    2. Marshall McLuhan

                    But you think Finnegans Wake “isn’t of interest” in your attraction to my Lemmy electric media messages.

                     

                    Anyhow (the matter is a troublous and a peniloose) have they
                    not called him at many’s their mock indignation meeting, veh-
                    men’s vengeance vective volleying, inwader and uitlander, the
                    notables, crashing libels in their sullivan’s mounted beards about
                    him, their right renownsable patriarch? Heinz cans everywhere
                    and the swanee her ainsell and Eyrewaker’s family sock that they
                    smuggled to life betune them, roaring (Big Reilly was the worst):
                    free boose for the man from the nark, sure, he never was worth
                    a cornerwall fark, and his banishee’s bedpan she’s a quareold bite
                    of a tark: as they wendelled their zingaway wivewards from his
                    find me cool’s moist opulent vinery, highjacking through the
                    nagginneck pass, as they hauled home with their hogsheads,
                    axpoxtelating, and claiming cowled consollation, sursumcordial,
                    from the bluefunkfires of the dipper and the martian’s frost?

                    Use they not, our noesmall termtraders, to abhors offrom
                    him, the yet unregendered thunderslog, whose sbrogue cunneth
                    none lordmade undersiding, how betwixt wifely rule and mens
                    conscia recti, then hemale man all unbracing to omniwomen, but
                    now shedropping his hitches like any maidavale oppersite orse-
                    riders in an idinhole? Ah, dearo! Dearo, dear! And her illian!
                    And his willyum! When they were all there now, matinmarked
                    for lookin on. At the carryfour with awlus plawshus, their happy-
                    ass cloudious! And then and too the trivials! And their bivouac!
                    And his monomyth! Ah ho! Say no more about it! I’m sorry!
                    I saw. I’m sorry! I’m sorry to say I saw!

                    Gives there not too amongst us after all events (or so grunts
                    a leading hebdromadary) some togethergush of stillandbutall-
                    youknow that, insofarforth as, all up and down the whole con-
                    creation say, efficient first gets there finally every time, as a com-
                    plex matter of pure form, for those excess and that pasphault
                    hardhearingness from their eldfar, in grippes and rumblions,
                    through fresh taint and old treason, another like that alter but
                    not quite such anander and stillandbut one not all the selfsame
                    and butstillone just the maim and encore emmerhim may always,
                    with a little difference, till the latest up to date so early in the
                    morning, have evertheless been allmade amenable?