• leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    18 hours ago

    They’re kind of vague about it but it sounds to me like you’d have to have some stuff posted online under your real name for it to find and match to. So if you’ve only ever posted things under various pseudonyms in social media, etc. it could match those up to each other, but not to your real identity.

    • pkjqpg1h@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Exactly it need a real data point to deanonymise you but you know many people has that data point

    • FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      sounds to me like you’d have to have some stuff posted online under your real name for it to find and match to

      They probably only need a reliable IRL ID for one of them. That’s a weaker requirement than posting under your name. Your name can be discovered other ways. For example browser fingerprinting, where that fingerprint is also associated with a “KYC” login elsewhere. There is a whole industry for using non-name signals to ID people. Big data is powerful.

      Ofc there are ways to frustrate that. Yet the attacker only has to win once. The defender has to win every time.

      But it will be statistical in nature. They’ll have some confidence attached to it. That could be very low, or quite high. Depends on how much you have disclosed online.