I don’t understand why Bill Gates still feels the need to do marketing work, he is already rich he doesn’t need to do commercials and blatantingly shill for a product for money like this.

Also the ides that anyone should listen to Bill Gates about needing or not needing government regulation, nationalization or trustbusting is actually insane.

  • P1nkman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    They quoted him wrong. He said “… will cause billionaires death…”. Why else is he and the other billionaires suddenly shit scared of LLM’s?

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Is it just me or does this “AI Doomsday” talk seem like coordinated messaging?

    Chatbots that are smart enough to destroy humanity would be really impressive, right? “Powerful enough to change the world” and “powerful enough to destroy the world” are similar claims and maybe they’re switching to the second one because nobody is buying the first anymore.

  • froztbyte@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I don’t understand why Bill Gates still feels the need to do marketing work

    because he’s actively doing works to change the world in specific (negative) ways. look into the history of gates-tied funding in nutrition programs, he’s got a bad-shit-for-humanity track record spanning well past a decade. has “just” had a better PR team than the clowns of vogue

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Billionaires could cause a total population extinction, those deserve regulation first, before AI.

    • supersquirrel@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Remember when Bill Gates lent his piece of shit opinion in on not letting India produce covid vaccines without patent approval and with their own production lines?

      That murdered a whole lot of people all by itself.

  • k0e3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Oh gosh this is so powerful, I better buy it before the other guys do! - some gullible CEO of a company

  • ruuster13@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The doomerism gets politicians talking about it instead of the problem right in front of them: these products are actively hacking into businesses across the world.

    • GardenGeek@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 hours ago

      these products are actively hacking into businesses across the world.

      No, they are not. They are used by people to do this. These systems aren’t able to act unprompted hence this whole , they’re breaking free" talk is nothing more but the companies trying to deflate the bubble they created before it pops with their money in it.

      • ruuster13@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        We’re making the same argument. The people building these tools must be held accountable.

        • Anisette [any/all]@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          you aren’t, you’re making a similar arguments to the doomers. The problem they have isn’t that their chatbots are “hacking people” or whatever, it’s that there isn’t a lot of room to either escalate or substantiate their claims left and not a lot of time to find a way to be profitable, somehow