• 32 Posts
  • 17 Comments
Joined 12 days ago
cake
Cake day: August 7th, 2026

help-circle
  • I don’t even think it will take many jobs permanently, but to your point it never mattered if AI works or can actually replace human beings at work, all that matters is that people believe it will and then that means that companies can fire large amounts of workers and hire them back under permanently “temporary” positions that pay less, have less stability and condescend the humanity of the worker at a basic level by framing their labor as a temporary substitution for a superior LLM/“AI” to eventually step in and replace.

    It is the SAME EXACT STORY as how Uber from the beginning framed its human drivers as temporary… even as dreams of self driving cars have faded from any serious discussion in the near term… the mistreatment, devaluing and dehumanization were successfully codified into the rideshare industry which was always the goal in the first place.

    Which isn’t to say that plenty of CEOs haven’t drank the KoolAid on AI and are totally lost in the sauce, but two things can be true at the same time…







  • It only doesn’t make sense until you realize It’s Alway’s Sunny In Philadelphia is Veep but dressed up in enough character comedy and narrowed down to small enough of the hellscape that it doesn’t become too bitter and overwhelming to swallow.

    The problem is if we accept It’s Always Sunny In Philadelphia as serious “high art” and not just crude character humor the criticism of our way of life becomes too biting.

    The thesis of Veep was “American power is a structure of dangerous idiots all the way down” and thesis of It’s Always Sunny In Philadelphia is “Imagine if these idiots weren’t too incompetent and selfish to constantly be barred from access to any actual power for any extended length of time?”.

    It is much easier to lean into the laughs with the latter critique but it requires a forgetting of the fact that there is inevitably an environment around the characters in It’s Always Sunny In Philadelphia that for some reason does not seem to notice how catastrophic these characters are and there is never any cohesive attempt to contain the damage these characters do by the community around them… and the only real reason that could drive that degree of egregious distraction is a mirror catastrophic breakdown around the characters of the social fabric of society/the social contract.

    It’s Always Sunny In Philadelphia in other words can be thought of as an end of the world play put on by cockroaches in the rubble to mock the behavior of the rich and powerful who drove the world into ruin by behaving exactly the way the hyperbolic theatrical characters the cockroaches act out behave. We all love this, but in order to love it without the cynicism we have to make the politics subconscious and move it back to serve as the stage set for clown-like characters that distract us with comedic spectacle that still conveys the message.

















  • I don’t think they are planning on needing to be democratically elected this time around.

    Biggs has numerous ties to white nationalist groups, and has been a guest on internet personality Stew Peters’s show, despite Peters having labeled Judaism a “death cult” and having called for the expulsion of Jews from the United States. The Southern Poverty Law Center has documented instances in which Biggs has attended far right rallies and conferences that were also attended by groups such as the Proud Boys. He also opposes pretty much all foreign aid spending and is a fervent 2020 election denier.

    None of this should pass for normal. That such extreme figures are being nominated by primary voters for top state and federal political offices speaks volumes to the trends within today’s Republican Party. This November, we will see how palatable such candidates are to the broader electorate.














  • Well said.

    The synthetic data thing here pisses me off too, synthetic data has uses in science predicting sensor responses, comparing reality to expected findings, and analyizing related phenomena to the artificial data at a fine resolution with computer modelling but none of those things have to do with establishing a ground truth for what the model considers part of reality, part of its understanding of reality or part of the facts that supposedly underpin the reality.

    If a scientist wants to analyze several types of algorithms and compare them maybe they might make a set of synthetic data that is artificially clean and simplified in order to compare and contrast the behavior of the algorithms especially at their edges and extremes. Note however that nothing about this process makes the algorithms smarter, the generative part is what the human scientist learns by observing what happens when the synthetic data is inputted into an algorithm. You need a human brain that understands context, understands the limits of a model vs the rest of reality, and understands things that aren’t explicitly said about the framing context of what is being examined.

    “A.I.” is a lossy data compression algorithm, there is a fundamental “knowledge entropy” here where the end result can never be smarter than the raw data because the “A.I.” can do nothing but apply a lossy data compression algorithm to the training data.

    This is not a cynical take on the potential for artificial intelligence but rather a hopeful and heartfelt thanks to the professions of librarians and archivists, for surely it is the curation of a quality data set where the genesis of intelligence happens. If nothing else Machine Learning proves that with brute force…