cm0002@lemy.lol to Programming@programming.dev · 2 days agoFed up with vibe coders, dev sneaks data-nuking prompt injection into their codearstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square46linkfedilinkarrow-up1226arrow-down12cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.setechnology@lemmit.online
arrow-up1224arrow-down1external-linkFed up with vibe coders, dev sneaks data-nuking prompt injection into their codearstechnica.comcm0002@lemy.lol to Programming@programming.dev · 2 days agomessage-square46linkfedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.setechnology@lemmit.online
minus-squarefavoredponcho@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down12·23 hours agoI mean, the developer showing he’s willing to create a security vulnerability in his own code may hurt adoption of his library. I would take it out of any of my code bases on principle alone.
minus-squareGuttural@jlai.lulinkfedilinkFrançaisarrow-up3arrow-down1·15 hours agoThis isn’t a security vulnerability, it’s idiot-proofing
I mean, the developer showing he’s willing to create a security vulnerability in his own code may hurt adoption of his library. I would take it out of any of my code bases on principle alone.
This isn’t a security vulnerability, it’s idiot-proofing