Personal opinion: Nathan seems to be really side-stepping a lot of concerns brought of up in the comments there. And referring to people coming together collectively in an open-letter when virtually all other channels are closed as ‘brigading’ is… Not cool. Edit: he retracted the use of brigading.

  • zelahdieliekeis@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ok, but how can it be called unnecessary involvement when it’s simply public comment, for which an avenue was provided? What is “the business of maintainers” only? Of course maintainers get more say… that does not mean everyone else who has a say should shut up if they don’t like it. If all of the public feedback was constructive towards the proposal without such severe disagreement on the basis, surely the author would welcome it. When popular disagreements like this come up it would be nice to have the crux of it addressed without being strawmanned to answer for the actions of some hooligan of the day.

    • tatterdemalion@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      The main point of OP is that this was a misunderstanding that turned into an overreaction. It sounds like there was never any confusion among the maintainers that they were trying to create a policy to prevent LLM slop PRs and reduce maintenance burden. Somehow non-maintainers derailed the discussion into an anti-AI tirade that was completely unproductive.

      So basically: yes people should shut up if they don’t have anything productive to add to the discussion.