• starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I do not respect gendered languages. I will not apologize for misgendering a pencil. The right form of “the” for an apple is “the apple.”

    • Cheesus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      In French, it’s ‘le pénis,’ but nobody says that. ‘Dick,’ is feminine (la bite.)

      Also, ‘vagina’ is masculine, but ‘pussy’ is feminine, because if you were to say ‘le chat’ it would mean a cat, but by feminising the word, it becomes ‘la chatte,’ meaning pussy.

      As someone who grew up Anglophone, I actually find gendered languages much more precise. On the other hand, in order to make yourself understood one must have a rich vocabulary, because the definitions of words are often more narrow than in English.

      And don’t even get me started on phrasal verbs… English is messy.

      • nightlily@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I actually find gendered languages much more precise.

        Just never ask a group of Germans what the singular article of Nutella is.

      • Kornblumenratte@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t get the weirdness of phrasal verbs? It’s a basic staple of every Indoeuropean language to generate verbs by tacking on prepositions. Ok, it’s a bit weird to use prepositions after the word, but that’s just standard Germanic separable verbs that are a bit regulized. So what?

        • Cheesus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          24 hours ago

          They’re just so ubiquitous in English. In my experience, people coming from the Romance languages have a very hard time with them, because most of the actions they describe are a single verb in their mother tongues. Imagine having to remember what two words mean, but then also having to remember that when you use the two words together, they form a distinct, sometimes even unrelated, meaning.

          And there’s thousands.

    • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Sorry, I don’t understand what I am seeing here. Is that someone xeeting a screenshot of someone reporting to Duolingo that penis should be feminine, not masculine in Spanish?

  • underreacting@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    One of my languages has three genders for living creatures, and two genders for items. Those genders are all different from each other: humans and other living beings are male/female/living neutral, things are item neutral/item neutral. An item neutral plural is also used for groups of living beings, but not for all groups of items.

    One item neutral singular can in some instances be used for a living being regardless of their gender. The other item neutral would be insulting if used about living beings, and especially dehumanising to humans (wish someone had told me this sooner).

    I have no idea when to use which item neutral. Locals keep correcting me or almost imperceptibly wincing when I get it wrong, so when I want to sound more fluent I just use the item plural for singulars as well - it seems less annoying for some reason.

    Oh, and for one of the item neutrals, if you accidentally use the other item neutral it means the plural of the first one. Kill me now, lol.

  • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    142
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve found that most of the time, just pick the most sexist answer you can think of, and you’ll typically be right!

    I really don’t like gendered languages.

        • KSP Atlas@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah, a lot of european languages have a three gender system: masculine, feminine and neuter

          Proto-Indo-European, the language which most European (and some South Asian languages) originate from, had a three gender system

          Even English used to have a three gender system before it disappeared in the Middle English period

          Despite the name, the neuter gender tends to not be used for people, although in some languages (such as Polish) the use of the neuter gender to refer to non-binary people is gaining traction

        • hydrashok@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yep. Masculine, feminine, and neuter. It’s annoyingly hard to learn. Plus all the other adjectives and such change to match. It’s wild.

          • rautapekoni@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            When I studied German a bit for fun I gave up on trying to memorize the genders and just used “das” for everything. Yeah it’s wildly incorrect but still mostly understandable which is fine for me.

      • LegoBrickOnFire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        There are some rules. Some of them are easy. One word ending is always feminine. I don’t remember which tho. which is a shame :/

        • nightlily@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          -ung is always feminin (among others like -keit) and mostly -e but the exceptions are enough that you can’t relax.

        • kossa@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah, no, it doesn’t make sense:

          Der Mann (the man - male article)

          Die Frau (the woman - female article)

          Der Junge (the boy - male article)

          Das Mädchen (the girl - neutral article)

          Like, come on gendered articles, you had one job.

        • LwL@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Still mostly only good as a guessing guideline because there’s no real system, just etymological patterns, but yea you can guess more than 33% for sure.

          • Pilon23@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            It’s not perfect, no, but I feel like you can identify feminine words based on their endings alone in 90% of cases, and if you can use a few general rules to make masculine/neuter better than a 50-50 guess, you’re already right more often than you’re wrong. Maybe even 75% with no rote menorization whatsoever

            Edit: I actually just read masculine is about 2x as common as other genders, so always guessing masculine should take you to 50% alone

        • 9bananas@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          doesn’t work at all, completely breaks down for the planetoids and moons…

          which makes sense, since those names are not german, which is why german grammar doesn’t apply to them.

          latin loanwords work the same way in german as they do in latin: completely at random and just have to be memorized…but at least they do follow the gender of the deity, so if you know your greco-roman pantheon it’s pretty easy!

          edit: also a very weird example, with a weird rule about ending in “e”; venus and earth (erde) are the only female planets…

    • Qwel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      You’ll be right 50% of the times. Or 33% in german. And it doesn’t match between languages. Like, “cat” is a she in german and a he in french. Often synonyms have different genders : une lettre/un courrier (both mean a mail).

      I think the issue is that you are searching your mind for correlations between gender and sexism-related, which is often easier than searching for non-correlation. If I ask you “quick, think of a singer that wears leather”, you’ll find one instantly. But if I ask “quick, find a singer that doesn’t wear leather” it takes a while, even though there more of them.

      If you want a better impression of the phenomenon, open a dictionary, go over words one by one and count the points.


      And also “organ” (the instrument) in french is male when singular and female when plural. “C’est un bel orgue” and “Ce sont de belles orgues”.

      • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago
        • Dick (bite) = Feminine
        • Cunt (con) = Masculine

        My favorite example for people who think grammatical gender has more than a passing correlation to social gender.

        That being said there is actual built-in sexism to grammatical gender in some areas, e.g. job titles (un chauffeur = a driver, une chauffeuse = a prostitute).

        • Qwel@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          “penis” is masculine while “bite” is feminine, too

          I would argue that “chauffeuse” for feminine drivers and “chauffeuse” for easy girls should be considered different words, homonyms, likely with separate etymologies. A feminine driver should be called a chauffeuse, and theorically an easy boy could be called a chauffeur. It will not happen because nobody uses the slur this way, but that’s unrelated to the grammatical structure of the language. Wouldn’t call it built-in.

          Words meanings always slide around and we have markers in some of them that determine whether the word describes a man or a women. Since we treat women and men differently, it’s not surprising that the feminine variant might end up with different connotations than the masculine one. But the words in question do not have gender, they inherit the gender of who they describe. It’s a different thing, unrelated to the assignment of genders to objects

          To be clear, I am not defending the idea that you should give gender to things, nor that you should change the suffix in all the words that refer to women. I think it’s stupid and I wish we didn’t even have pronouns in the first place

        • Kornblumenratte@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Well, that’s because chauff-eur/euse means neither driver nor prostitute, but “heater”, as in “someone who makes hot”. One heats the steam engine, the other their clients. The sexism is not built in the language or the gender system, but in the patriarchal culture.

    • Hjalmar@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      I only studied french for a short time, but I feel like that really doesn’t work for french:

      • chemisier, blouse, is masculine
      • ceinture, belt, is feminine

      Those were the two onces I could remember like this half a year after ending my french studies, but could be that those are only two uncommon counterexamples.

      Also, both of these are what you would “expect” in German (die Bluse, der Gürtel)

      • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well it works for this example, because lave-vaisselle is feminine. The root vasselle (dishes) is feminine.

        • FundMECFS@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          vaiselle is actually inhereting its gender in an unrelated manner.

          It comes from Latin vāscellum which is a Neuter noun.

          But the specific form that gave rise to vaiselle was the collective plural of that noun vāscella. source

          And it’s a common pattern that in vulgar latin, (what gave rise to french), collective plural nouns were interpreted as feminine. I think this is a general tendency and unrelated to the noun’s meaning. The reason often given is that neuter plural endings and feminine singular endings were the same in Latin.

          BTW; this is also the latin root of the english word vessel.

          (PS: I agree with you that gender in language is problematic and I prefer non gendered as well).

      • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Interesting how those words are reversed as far as genders go in Spanish:

        • Chemisier = Blusa, feminine
        • Ceinture = Cinturón, masculine

        Despite both languages having common Latin roots.

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s what I love about my native Hungarian, even pronouns are ungendered.

      Everything else is stupid complicated though. We have tonal harmony to worry about instead.

    • ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      There was a whole battle about whether covid was masculine or feminine. I think feminine won, probably because it sucked.

      • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Feminine is what the Académie settled on, months after everyone settled on Masculine.

        That institution holds some normative power with other institutions (e.g. some media outlets) but has utterly failed to impose its outdated and reactionary outlook to anyone but other reactionaries. They’re constantly coming out with revisions for words that reached common parlance years earlier.

        So common usage is Le covid. If someone used the feminine I’d have to assume they unironically use the word “Wokisme”, because only these kinds of people actually think that the Académie is worth listening to.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I also found that if you really want to be understood in French, you have to force yourself into an over the top, bordering on ridiculous French accent.

      So the key to speaking good French is to default to the most sexist position possible and intentionally speak like an asshole.

      • Cheesus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        It sounds ridiculous to us, but that’s just how they talk. It also works in reverse for them; I sometimes have to remind my spouse when we’re among English speakers that she sounds like she doesn’t have enough mash potatoes in her mouth.

  • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Mark Twain also struggled with language

    To continue with the German genders: a tree is male, its buds are female, its leaves are neuter; horses are sexless, dogs are male, cats are female—tomcats included, of course; a person’s mouth, neck, bosom, elbows, fingers, nails, feet, and body are of the male sex, and his head is male or neuter according to the word selected to signify it, and NOT according to the sex of the individual who wears it—for in Germany all the women wear either male heads or sexless ones; a person’s nose, lips, shoulders, breast, hands, and toes are of the female sex; and his hair, ears, eyes, chin, legs, knees, heart, and conscience haven’t any sex at all. The inventor of the language probably got what he knew about a conscience from hearsay.

    • aceshigh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Dogs are male? In my language dogs are female. So I guess there is no standard for gendered language.

      • SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        2 days ago

        It is said that when English went from old English (which was gendered) to modern English, part of the problem was that the genders of the Germanic roots didn’t match the genders of the French influences so the people chose to just skip it all together.

      • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        There’s absolutely no standard. A common trope among language learners of gendered languages whose mother tongue is also gendered is that they always pick the wrong gender for everything.

      • Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Dunno about German but in french dogs are male or female depending on their actual gender (obviously the female word has been adopted as a slur towards women, to be fair sometimes the masculine also is used that way for men).

        • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          In German, dogs are male by default (der Hund can be used as a generic term for both male and female dogs), but bitches are female (die Hündin). Cats are female by default (die Katze), but tomcats are male (der Kater).

          We do not use Hündin as a slur for women, but Hund can be used as a slur for men.

        • Elvith Ma'for@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          German has both genders for dogs, but since the variants look (and sound) slightly different, it’s not instantly obvious:

          Der Hund - a male dog
          Die Hündin - a female dog

        • Kaput@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          The male word is also used as slur for men in Québec. It’s usually accompanied by copious religious profanity and a few tasteful adjectives.

          • C’est un ostie de câlisse de chien sale à marde, Tabarnak!
  • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    2 days ago

    I asked my Francophone buddy that grew up in backwoods Quebec how the hell he kept it all in his head. He said that he never bothered.

    If it had an “e” on the end, he just assumed it was feminine.

    If he was drunk, he didn’t give a single flying tabernak.

    • Lightfire228@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s likely the same as English spelling. Just years and years of repeated exposure, and you eventually pick up most of it through osmosis

    • SorryQuick@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      There’s a pattern to it. I don’t know what it is, and I’m not sure anyone knows consciously. But for example, when creating new words (eg. fantasy/sci-fi context) there usually isn’t any confusion as to what that word’s gender will be, it just sounds bad with the wrong pronoun. There are a few exceptions of course, same as “autobus” and “avion” which technically have a gender assigned but people toss a coin every time.

    • Rothe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It is not a problem for native speakers though. These kinds of things are only something you think about if you are learning it as a second language later in life. If you grew up with them you just aborb the information and use it without thinking about it.

      • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Like adjective order in English. If you point it out to the average native speaker more than likely they won’t even know they do it.

    • Qwel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      How does anyone manage to keep allll the words pronunciation and spelling they know is already amazing, craming pronouns on top of that isn’t much worse

    • verdi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yes, but what if you’re a man married to a man? Which one is the washing machine? 🤌

      • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        One of the few genders German and French agree on is that a machine is female.

        So, if a man is considered to be a machine he is female in that field.

        • verdi@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          “Europeans solve trans bathroom problem, whoever does the laundry, pees in the ladies room”

      • bss03@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        My body is a MACHINE that turns DIRTY things into CLEAN things. /skeleton-deadlift-meme

        I am.

        (j/k; I’m pretty poor at cleaning things.)

  • FewerWheels@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 days ago

    I like when the gender changes what the noun is. Here are a couple Spanish examples: la cometa = the kite (feminine) or el cometa = the comet (masculine) la papa = the potato (feminine) or el papa = the Pope (masculine).

    Swahili has 18 genders, though only 16 are in active use.

    • Battle_Masker@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Oh hey, someone that used gender in regards to Spanish correctly.

      I say that in regards to one of my Spanish teachers from high school who would always grade us wrong when we say male/female instead of masculine/feminine. One day he explained that by saying “Objects have gender! People have sex!”

  • Darkness343@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    English is such a poor language that they only have the article The and nouns without genders.

    Seethe and cope.

  • assembly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    For all of the shit people talk about the English language, this is a big thing I appreciate about it. What the hell was the point of even gendering random things from the start? In German, the main gendering are die, der, and das with das being gender neutral. I would like to see a world where in scenarios like that they just move everything to das.

    • Hawke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think it’s to make it less ambiguous.

      In English you just use the same word and figure it out from context. Someone else gave some other Spanish examples but I like “right” (direction) = “la derecha” vs “right” (human rights) = “los derechos”.

      Of course there’s still so many variants of meaning that grammatical gender doesn’t help much.

      • QuestionMark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        If you’re writing a poem in German, you can apparently switch the positions of the subject, object and indirect object without changing the meaning, since the gender and article of the word indicate whether it’s the subject (Nominativ), object (Akkusativ) or indirect object (Dativ). (e.g. subject: der Mann, object: den Mann, indirect object: dem Mann)

        • Tonava@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          You don’t need grammatical gender at all for that though. Says a native speaker of an agglutinative language

    • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Now if you would level up once more and stopped having gendered pronouns.

      That’s the ultimate level 😀

  • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    Is it possible to bash your way though this, as a foreigner, by getting the gender wrong half the time? Are mis-genedered nouns sometimes homophones for completely different things, or can you be understood with bad grammar, regardless?

    I say this since sometimes “bad/wrong” is less about understanding and more about “that sounds funny” or “nobody talks like that.”

    • Qwel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      You will be understood, it will just give people a small pause.

      Sometimes it may cause confusion, like “the phone (he) went through the washing machine (she) and now <she/he> is broken” changes meaning if you get the pronoun wrong. But then if you are used to disambiguate thIs kind of situation - and you have to in english - it shouldn’t happen too often

      • underreacting@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Good to know! I’ll just not let any phones into any washing machines while traveling, to avoid grammatical confusion. I’ll wash my phone when I get home instead.