• mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Ranked Choice is a misuse of ranked ballots. Say an election goes like this:

    40% vote A > B > C.
    35% vote C > B > A.
    25% vote B > C > A.

    Plurality says A wins, because Plurality sucks. You don’t even need a bare majority. You just need everyone else to split.

    RCV says C wins: B has the fewest top votes, so they’re eliminated. The race becomes 40% A > C versus 60% C > A. Better… but still wrong, because 65% of people would prefer B > C.

    Condorcet methods like Ranked Pairs get that right. They model every runoff: A vs B is 40-60, A vs C is 40-60, B vs C is 65-35. B wins every 1v1 and is obviously the best candidate according to these voters. The supermajority prefers B.

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Oh that’s interesting, I always thought that ranked choice would put B in there but in that example it shows that that wouldn’t happen. I never saw or thought about it that way. Thanks!