“​An unmistakable majority wants a party that will fight harder against the corporations and rich people they see as responsible for keeping them down,” wrote the New Republic’s editorial director.

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    It has worked on a big enough scale to matter, it’s how so many government programs have been gutted over the past few decades. They’re always screeching about “fraud” and “abuse” which basically just means “non-white people getting benefits.”

    There’s definitely a limit to how far race consciousness can suppress class consciousness, but it definitely works on a big scale.

    • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      It works in a vaccum where economic policy is the same due to uniparty, but again that doesn’t work when put up against popular policies.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        A lot of government assistance programs were popular, and they were eroded anyway because their popularity wasn’t sustained through outreach and propaganda. Democrats wouldn’t stand up for government assistance programs because they didn’t really like them either, so the only thing people heard was how bad it was. There needs to be a concerted effort to educate the masses.

        Policies aren’t popular on their own. They still have to be made popular and kept popular, by activists and politicians and parties.

        • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          They remain popular. They were cut not because they lost popularity, but because nobody were willing to improve them and that then allowed racists to win and cut them. Most openly racist modern politician Trump campaigned on keeping all the social safety net programs because they were popular and are still popular, if someone would have campainged on expanding them they would have won instead.

          US has presidential term limits because racists were incapable of winning against popular policies back in the day.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            And yet, people voted for candidates who pledged to cut them. That has to be reckoned with.

            There’s definitely a problem with Democrats being unwilling to improve these programs, because ultimately the Democratic leadership hates government programs too, but there’s also the problem with people voting to take government benefits away form undesirables. Again, policies aren’t popular on their own, they need to be promoted and advanced. We have a role to play.