Ah yes, something traditional programming could never achieve, automatically sorting data into buckets. It’s easy to forget how we went from clay tablets to ChatGPT with nothing in-between.
Ok go ahead. I’ll give you some labeled example data, and you can use traditional programming to sort these assorted text strings into the “supports premise”, “rejects premise”, and “neither supports nor rejects” buckets. Once traditional programming does that without BERT or some other classifier, I’ll put in a rec for the full data and you can come work at my company running a data science division.
sorry I ain’t working for someone that spends their time calling people retarded in a tiny anti-AI sub because they don’t draw a bright enough line between different flavors of AI for your personal tastes. Thanks for the offer though, but I’ll have to politely refuse to prove to you the fact that programmatic sentiment analysis existed long before people used AI for it, and it worked just fine.
Well that’s good. I was worried I was going to have to tell you that job offers on Lemmy aren’t serious, but you cleared that bar with a herculean bound! I’ll take your refuse to prove as “can’t meaningfully prove” without loss of generality and go about my day. It’s been real.
Ok. Brb I’m going to go classify these 8.5M data points into 6 categories by hand.
Ah yes, something traditional programming could never achieve, automatically sorting data into buckets. It’s easy to forget how we went from clay tablets to ChatGPT with nothing in-between.
Ok go ahead. I’ll give you some labeled example data, and you can use traditional programming to sort these assorted text strings into the “supports premise”, “rejects premise”, and “neither supports nor rejects” buckets. Once traditional programming does that without BERT or some other classifier, I’ll put in a rec for the full data and you can come work at my company running a data science division.
Let’s go. There’s more to AI/ML than chatgpt.
sorry I ain’t working for someone that spends their time calling people retarded in a tiny anti-AI sub because they don’t draw a bright enough line between different flavors of AI for your personal tastes. Thanks for the offer though, but I’ll have to politely refuse to prove to you the fact that programmatic sentiment analysis existed long before people used AI for it, and it worked just fine.
Well that’s good. I was worried I was going to have to tell you that job offers on Lemmy aren’t serious, but you cleared that bar with a herculean bound! I’ll take your refuse to prove as “can’t meaningfully prove” without loss of generality and go about my day. It’s been real.