• panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    There’s no 8k content, and only recently do standard connectors support 8k at high refresh rates.

    There’s barely any actual 4K content you can consume.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      There’s barely any actual 4K content you can consume.

      Honestly a little surprised the IMAX guys didn’t start churning out 4k+ content given that they’ve been in the business forever.

      But I guess “IMAX in your living room” isn’t as sexy when the screen is 60" rather than 60’

      • jqubed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        You don’t even need IMAX for 4K; ordinary 35mm film can normal scan to a nice 4K video. Films shot on the 65mm IMAX cameras would probably make good 8K content, but most of that was educational films, not what most people apparently want to watch all the time.

        The digital IMAX projections were actually a step backwards in resolution.

  • FireWire400@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s about time the electronics industry as a whole realises that innovation for the sake of innovation is rarely a good thing

    • Scratch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Look, we can’t have TVs that last 15 years anymore!

      We need to keep people buying every year or two. Otherwise line not go up! Don’t you understand that this is about protecting The Economy?!

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Boomers economic policy is like if Issac Newton saw an apple falling from a tree, and came to the conclusion it would always accelerate at the same speed no matter what, even though the ground with the entire ass planet behind it is right fucking there.

        Numbers can not constantly go up, it’s just that’s what was happening their whole lives and they can’t accept that their childhoods was a blip and not how things always were and always will be.

        They just can’t wrap their heads around it. They have such shit tier empathy they can’t comprehend that they’re an exception.

        • cmbabul@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          A large number of the problems we currently face and will in the future come down to boomers being worse than their predecessors at grasping, understanding, and accepting their own impermanence and unimportance on the grand stage of reality.

          Most of them need to have a series of existential crises or maybe read some fucking Satre so they can stop with the Me generation bullshit. It’s wild that the first generation to do LSD in mass is somehow the one that needs to experience ego death the most

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s not even innovation, per say. It’s just Big Number Go Up.

      Nobody seems to want to make a TV that makes watching TV more pleasant. They just want to turn these things into giant bespoke advertising billboards in your living room.

      Show me the TV manufacturer who includes an onboard ad blocker. That’s some fucking innovation.

      • chocrates@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        You can’t really find a dumb TV anymore. I might see how big of a monkey I can find when I’m ready to upgrade, but I doubt I’ll find one big enough and cheap enough.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I hooked my computer up to the HDMI and have used that as my primary interface.

          It’s not perfect, but it screens out 95% of bullshit

          • tyler@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            That doesn’t, unless you’ve blocked your TV from network access, because they use ACR - Automated Content Recognition - that literally scans what is being displayed over your hdmi port and then sells it off to advertisers.

          • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            That won’t save you anymore. My boss bought a smallish smart TV in contravention of my explicit instructions for use as a CCTV monitor because it was “cheap.” It nags you on power up with a popup whining about not being able to access the internet, and if you don’t feed it your Wifi password it will subsequently display that same popup every 30 minutes or so requiring you to dismiss it again. And again. And again. Apparently the play is to just annoy you into caving and letting it access your network.

            Instead I packed it up and returned it. Fuck that.

            • tyler@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              If you are at a business you should have an access point or router that is capable of blocking specific devices from WAN access. But I would create a new segmented network, block that network from WAN access entirely, put it on its own VLAN, and then connect the TV to that network.

              • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                I’d assume it nags whenever it can’t connect to the home server, and just says “network”.

                So when they go out of business any remaining units will nag forever.

                • tyler@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  You can use your router or access point tools to check what address it’s trying to resolve and then set up a redirect to a device that can respond with a fake response.

  • Dirty AnCom@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    What’s interesting to me is that film is roughly, perceptually around 8K. However, very very few people have cinema-sized screens in their home, so what’s the point if it’s “only” even 80 inches?

    I think giant 8K monitors are still useful for productivity, but only for a small number of people. I personally like having multiple monitors over one big one.

    • ccunix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I cannot fathom why, but people do not seem capable of understanding resolution, screen size and viewing distance as important factors that interplay with each other.

      8k is absolutely pointless on a 49" TV that is several metres away. However, I will take 4k over 1080 on even a 24" computer screen every time.

      That is just me though, your preferences and vision may be different to mine. Same with the monitors. You like multiple screens, I prefer a single larger screen.