There is an issue with that, if the starlink saterlites were destroyed they would no longer be able to make avoidance menovers. This could very quickly lead to a cascade of massive crashes that pretty much means we will never be able to leave the earth for a long time.
The researchers suspect this would help shrink the ozone hole that forms over the South Pole every year,
Ok, so there seems to be a silver lining.
A lesser Ozone hole during a certain period.
Now just to know if the Ozone decimation is winning over this little phenomenon.
Either way, the LEO satellites seem to be to big a mess for their worth, unless you are just considering their military worth.
There is an issue with that, if the starlink saterlites were destroyed they would no longer be able to make avoidance menovers. This could very quickly lead to a cascade of massive crashes that pretty much means we will never be able to leave the earth for a long time.
Not true. Starlink are in a very low orbit and regularly (1 or 2 a day) will simply burn up themselves as they fall out of orbit.
deleted by creator
🤦
I always thought of de-orbiting just to burn-off as a waste, but now this.
deleted by creator
Ok, so there seems to be a silver lining.
A lesser Ozone hole during a certain period.
Now just to know if the Ozone decimation is winning over this little phenomenon.
Either way, the LEO satellites seem to be to big a mess for their worth, unless you are just considering their military worth.