• Dimand@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I have no doubt that that code is over complicated and inaccessible and probably needs a full rewrite that actually makes it accessible and effective.

    That said, I’m sure there are far too many builders that are looking for the cheap and easy loopholes that certainly contributed to its current state.

    Literally yesterday I found a beam in a 2007 apartment build that has been secured to the slab above with framing nails. This should have been done with a proper concrete bolt or anchor. The nails were failing and the whole ceiling was starting to fall.

    Honestly. I think the government should design a cookie cutter 3 bed house that is standardised and easy to build, easy to check and certify the build. Buy or hell even make the framing and materials locally in bulk and start pumping out the same house over and over again.

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      Hell, they did that last postwar with the ol’ concrete slabs at the Holmesglen factory.

      (Grew up in one, please do not use that concrete prefab again i do not recommmend)

      But the fact that modern builds are so shite everyone knows it is ridiculous. That’s not a “complex code” issue, that’s a shonky industry

      • Dave.@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        I grew up in a mining town where there were just 5 or 6 different core designs for three and four bedroom houses, and a street was made up of those designs with minor variations like rotating it 90 degrees on the lot or mirroring the design.

        If you weren’t looking for it, that lack of variety was completely unnoticeable as you drove down the street.