Nat (she/they)

They invented more genders and somebody had to take them

It’s a neat option, but should not be forced.

Websites should not get to dictate my security model. I’ll accept annoying me about being less secure because I get that people are dumb, but you’ve gotta choose somehow! Also, any passkey is safer than a password, so that’s still BS.

“It’s not that deep” feels the same as “it’s just a joke”. No, it’s a joke with a point, and that point is wrong. I will not let people smuggle in a bad idea without criticism just because they phrased it as a joke or sarcasm.

“The deep state ate my face” - Leopards Eating People’s Faces voter.

Is “human exploitation” the new “think of the children”?

Communism says yes

Are you selling one?

Not me writing my quickshell panel for over a week straight (so far) 👀

The catch is I’m the user whose space I’m breaking

Nothing, but I’d argue you don’t need a brain for the sensory parts doing sensing to count as senses.

I mean, so are our sense before being processed by the brain.

It’s that naughty biological sax 🎶🎷

Right after the part where it says my feelings are actually objectively correct.

It probably comes from C, which also copies by default, though it doesn’t have copy constructors.

Like, 49% early? Early as in the exponential curve is still at a low y value? Certainly not early in terms of time.

I actually would prefer people see them as ideals rather than unchanging facts of the universe, because unchanging facts don’t require you to fight to keep them like ideals do, and I’m tired of hearing diatribes about the world being just instead of people actually making it just.

I don’t see how a blockchain is necessary there. Couldn’t they just use transaction databases and simple messaging between banks? Also, what is your definition of blockchain? Just a distributed linked list? Proof of work (the part I don’t understand the need for)?

Given the demographics of Linux devs, it probably would be the latter.

They used the little-known “who’s gonna stop me?” loophole