• 0 Posts
  • 25 Comments
Joined 26 days ago
cake
Cake day: March 8th, 2026

help-circle
  • Funny you accuse me of being American, was the same thought that had me wondering if you were referring to the Nazis. Wouldn’t be the first time I’ve seen that sentiment. But yes, as a fellow European I’m not blind at all to the communist experiment and it’s effect on the whole of eastern europe. Very important to be aware about it so we don’t repeat the same mistakes in the creation of a better system than the current capital-death-cult.

    But like it’s not common knowledge you’re slinging around here, it’s kinda weird this energy you’re bringing of antogonising just because other people might not have the same information you do.

    Also also, no one exampl can be the platonic ideal of something. And it’s a way better example than what I originally thought, but u know, if you think about it’s very obvious that every instance of socialist thinking implemented wouldn’t necessarily turn out as the socialist unity party. Otherwise it would be the only example one could point to, and even there it’s not like the law of gravity, nothing stopping people from going “yeah that parts not constructive turns out let’s not do that”.









  • Idk i generally agree but the joke here isn’t really rape but more the subversion of expectations, the joke couldve easily been ‘yeah i learned last week the magpie steals shit’ cut to panel of their keys getting stolen, instead of them learning it through a book. The rape part is of course to heighten the shock value, and is thus more of a prop than the actual joke imo. So it’s not like the underlying message is ‘rape is funny right guys?’, but i definitely also see the objectionable part of using such serious topics like rape as a comedic prop

    Also sidenote, this is cyanide and happiness, that’s kinda their whole thing










  • Yes…………

    Notice the ‘should’ in there?

    That word implys that he is talking about a moral prerogative and not a judicial matter…

    Which of course means its unenforceable. You’re missing the point entirely if you think that even needs to be brought up.

    Him: “People Ought to // ought not to do this behaviour”

    Your: “Cant Force them hahahaha pwned 😎"

    Maybe just take a second to think about the implications of what you’re reading instead of embarrassing yourself like this going autocomplete mode and writing irrelevant ass comments