

Not catholic myself so take it with a bucket of salt, but i always figured it was because it was all the holy dudes doing the voting. Sacred by osmosis or something


Not catholic myself so take it with a bucket of salt, but i always figured it was because it was all the holy dudes doing the voting. Sacred by osmosis or something


You talking about the national socialists? They where about as socialist as the democratic peoples republic of north Korea is democratic and of the people, e.g in name only.


Kind of yeah, one of the reasons for the pope existing. That’s why they keep doing the whole voting thing


🦃 TURKEY MENTION
1 or 5, others look exhausting tbh
Chad moves. Get theology-mogged you faithless heathencell
No no i getcha, should’ve maybe stressed the ‘its still objectionable’ part a bit more. All respect for being a buzzkill btw, that shit is often needed.
Idk i generally agree but the joke here isn’t really rape but more the subversion of expectations, the joke couldve easily been ‘yeah i learned last week the magpie steals shit’ cut to panel of their keys getting stolen, instead of them learning it through a book. The rape part is of course to heighten the shock value, and is thus more of a prop than the actual joke imo. So it’s not like the underlying message is ‘rape is funny right guys?’, but i definitely also see the objectionable part of using such serious topics like rape as a comedic prop
Also sidenote, this is cyanide and happiness, that’s kinda their whole thing
Hey that’s the attitude, as long as you’re having fun with it ✌️
They’re taking you for a ride or are embarrassingly and wilflully stupid, don’t waste your breath comrade
Being honest about the uncertain nature of the mystical experiences of our world is a cowards move now? P sure that has been a marker of wisdom for many great thinkers in the western canon, eg well over 2000 years
I mean you go girl more power to ya but it definitely isn’t easier to explain pastafarianism than agnosticism to normies. Noone except programmers and other too online people even know it exists (yes i am also a terminally online freak relax peeps, real recognize real)
Sublime
Carries that Magritte spirit with the playful title leading to a complex investigation of both the media, actual narrative and contextual, ping-ponging. Showcasing the barebones framework of meaning-making through tecnhique
Also he looks scared someone comfort the lil fella


Omg no fucking way dude :O


What an amazingly observant comment… Whats your point smart guy?
Hannah Montana Linux OS keeping this proud tradition going singlehandedly. ✊
Edit: not singlehandedly, just learned of the two other parts of the holy Linux trifecta, RebeccaBlackOS & Justin Bieber Linux Distro
Yes…………
Notice the ‘should’ in there?
That word implys that he is talking about a moral prerogative and not a judicial matter…
Which of course means its unenforceable. You’re missing the point entirely if you think that even needs to be brought up.
Him: “People Ought to // ought not to do this behaviour”
Your: “Cant Force them hahahaha pwned 😎"
Maybe just take a second to think about the implications of what you’re reading instead of embarrassing yourself like this going autocomplete mode and writing irrelevant ass comments


Happened in Denmark as well, almost identically. Hoping it was the last deathspasms of the middle-class petite bourgeois entitlement politics. And here’s to hoping it dies quietly instead of wandering out into more violent fascistoid ideological landscapes.
Funny you accuse me of being American, was the same thought that had me wondering if you were referring to the Nazis. Wouldn’t be the first time I’ve seen that sentiment. But yes, as a fellow European I’m not blind at all to the communist experiment and it’s effect on the whole of eastern europe. Very important to be aware about it so we don’t repeat the same mistakes in the creation of a better system than the current capital-death-cult.
But like it’s not common knowledge you’re slinging around here, it’s kinda weird this energy you’re bringing of antogonising just because other people might not have the same information you do.
Also also, no one exampl can be the platonic ideal of something. And it’s a way better example than what I originally thought, but u know, if you think about it’s very obvious that every instance of socialist thinking implemented wouldn’t necessarily turn out as the socialist unity party. Otherwise it would be the only example one could point to, and even there it’s not like the law of gravity, nothing stopping people from going “yeah that parts not constructive turns out let’s not do that”.